Open Forum
New Delhi, 15 July 2010
Death Penalty
NATIONAL DEBATE
MUST
By VS Dharmakumar
Debates on death penalty have rarely taken a front seat in India. Perhaps,
the reason why former President Dr Abdul Kalam called for a national debate on
the issue recently.
Capital punishment has been in regular use in the West for
thousands of years. But there too, no serious and systematic debate took place
until Italian philosopher and politician Cesare Beccaria published an essay,
"On Crimes and Punishment" in 1764. He theorized “there was no
justification for the State to take a life and the death penalty was a war of a
entire nation against a citizen, whose destruction they consider as necessary,
or useful to the general good."
Since the publication of Beccaria’s treatise, mass killers
and murderers have been attracting a motley crowd of people to stand beside
them in support, pretending they are more humane than the rest of the society. In
India, however, a recent newspaper survey shows that an overwhelming 91% favour
the hanging of 26/11 Mumbai perpetrator Ajmal Kasab and only 24% favoured
abolition of death penalty.
Let's take a peep into the history of crime, disobedience
and punishment. They are as old as mankind. No society in the world is devoid
of them as crime and disobedience are inherent in human nature. Recall, the
first murder victim was Abel, first son of Adam and Eve. The first murderer was
their second son Cain. He murdered his elder brother simply out of jealousy.
Said Aristotle, "Man, when perfected, is the best of
animals, but when separated from law and justice, he is the worst of all."
Plainly, throughout history and across different societies, criminals have been
punished/ executed for a variety of offences. The purpose of punishment is for social
good and for reducing social evil. Punishment is the solution to steering
people away from committing crimes. Fear is the pillar of the foundation of
punishment.
Hence punishment must remain for safeguarding society from
law breakers. Punishment should be proportionate to the severity of the crime
committed. God created the fear of supernatural punishment in the minds of
people. Most of the dreadful customs and rituals of mankind originated from the
loathing of crime and the resolve to enforce the notion of right living.
Besides, “An eye for eye,” symbolized Babylonian King
Hammurabi's code of laws in 1700 BC. Under his code, if a house collapsed
killing its owner, the builder was put to death; if the owner's son died in the
collapse, the builder's son was put to death. This expression found a place in
the legal system of almost all countries.
True, punishing a person for a crime he did not commit is
miscarriage of justice. But all criminal justice systems carry that risk. Remember,
the most infamous travesty of justice in history was the execution of Jesus
Christ by Pontius Pilate on 3 April 33AD. Jesus was tried in a kangaroo court
and convicted on charge of blasphemy that carried the death penalty.
Also undeniable is the possibility of innocents getting
punished or even executed. To prevent this happening greater precautions are
available and mistaken executions are indeed rare these days. An innocent
accused of crime has extensive opportunities to be vindicated during lengthy
trial. In any case death penalty is awarded only in the rarest of rare cases.
Sadly, today the problem is not of innocents getting
punished but of guilty persons who actually murdered people going scot-free. Thanks
to legal technicalities, lack of evidence and the influence of Sir William
Blackstone’s often invoked maxim: “Better that 10 guilty escape than one
innocent suffer”.
The Draconian Athens code of 7th Century BC
prescribed death for almost all criminal offenses. As did ancient Rome, which ordered death
penalty for a wide range of crimes: murder, treason, arson and rape. In Britain, by
1700, there were 222 crimes punishable by death. Stealing 40 shillings from a
house, five shillings from a shop, robbing a rabbit warren, cutting down a
tree, and counterfeiting tax stamps were crimes inviting death sentences.
The earliest known legal decision on capital punishment
dates back to 1850 BC. A clay tablet reveals the case, of the murder of a
temple employee by three men. The men were executed in front of the victim's
house. In USA
the first recorded execution took place in 1608.
Arguably, the cry against capital punishment was perhaps
justified in the olden days, because death penalty was common, errors were too
many and crimes warranting death were numerous. Today it is not so. Death is
awarded only in the rarest of rare cases.
Even Beccaria conceded that the only time death was
necessary was when that death could insure the security of a nation. This would
be rare, only in cases of absolute anarchy or when a nation was on the verge of
losing its liberty. Were not Afzal Guru and Ajmal Kasab’s crimes capable of
creating anarchy and igniting a war of catastrophic possibilities with our
neighbour?
Paradoxically, the fear of death is a universal phenomenon
and whatever we fear most, we will deter most. All creatures have a natural
fear of death. Murderers fear only their own death. Thus, executing convicted
death-row murderers swiftly will send a message to potential murderers that the
same fate can visit them if they kill people.
Importantly, hardened convicted death-row criminals hardly get
reformed and the sooner they are given their punishment, the better. This is
the lesson we must learn from releasing dreaded militant Maulana Masood Azhar.
If the Government had sent Masood to the gallows for the ’rarest of the rare’
crimes he perpetrated in Kashmir, IC-814 would not have been hijacked to
Kandahar and the revival of jihadi activities
could have been avoided.
In fact, long term imprisonment of a criminal makes him more
and more hardened and less and less morally refined. Rehabilitating an offender
in society and making him a law-abiding citizen is difficult, if not
impossible. Legend has it that even God decided to destroy all people on earth
because they all became too wicked. Cruel measures are necessary for repression
of brutal acts and promotion of morality.
Ironically, abolitionists worry more about the convicted
murderers’ lives and ignore the lives they snuffed out. Their argument that
death penalty does not deter criminals falls before Isaac Ehrlich study in
1973. He pointed out that for every inmate executed, 7 lives were spared
because others were deterred from committing murder. Saudi Arabia is the best example to
substantiate that death sentence is a proven deterrent. If it is not a
deterrent anywhere else, it is because executing convicted persons is not swift
and also not sure.
Clearly, it is an ignominious anomaly to spend public money
on housing, feeding and clothing people who are a danger to society and its
peace. If the Supreme Court's orders execution, such orders need to be promptly
carried out. Saving the lives of prospective victims by deterring murderers is
much better than preserving the lives of some convicted murderers. ----- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|