Round The World
New Delhi, 29 June 2010
India-Pakistan Talks
BULLS-EYE ON TERROR
By Monish Tourangbam
Research Scholar, School of
International Studies (JNU)
Terrorism took centre-stage twice-over
in Indo-Pak talks. First, during the recent Indo-Pak Foreign Secretary level
talks. Second, when Indian Home Minister Chidambaram met his Pakistani
counterpart Rehman Malik on the sidelines of the SAARC Interior Ministers'
Conference in Islamabad
last week.
Both times New
Delhi reiterated that terrorism had to be fought with utmost
sincerity in the interest of both countries as Islamabad has often been found wanting in its
resolve to act against the anti-India terror groups emanating from its soil.
Importantly, it had failed to
satisfy the Indian Government and the people at large in prosecuting the Mumbai
attacks mastermind Hafiz Saeed and other terrorist leaders. As a result of the
dilly-dallying tactics of Islamabad
in dealing with the perpetrators of the 26/11 attack in Mumbai, New Delhi had to
deep-freeze all forms of dialogue with its neighbour.
But, stopping the
dialogue process and diplomatic contacts have failed to pay dividends for New Delhi and in fact the absence of official channels has
further negated chances of putting pressure on the Pakistan civilian Government.
True, skeptics still question the rationale behind resuming talks with Islamabad. Not a few aver
that resumption of dialogue would not only show the lack of resolve in India but
embolden terror networks to carry out more strikes. However, New Delhi cannot afford to be static. It
should be dynamic in adapting to the changes.
The move to re-open
dialogue was initiated when Prime Minister Manmohan Singh met his Pakistani counterpart
Yousaf Raza Gilani in Thimpu on the sidelines of the SAARC Summit. This was
followed by deliberations between India’s Foreign Secretary Nirupama
Rao and her Pakistani counterpart Salman Bashir recently. Both, struck common ground
vis-à-vis the threat extremism and terrorism
posed to the warring neighbours and the region.
The talks were
followed by optimistic remarks that the meetings were more successful than
expected, thus presenting a good base on which to start a more sustained and
comprehensive contact. The effort on both sides was to bridge the “trust
deficit” between the neighbours. But, proceed cautiously. Another attack on the
Indian soil could trigger a new round of domestic agitation making it difficult
for New Delhi to maintain normal diplomatic ties
with Islamabad.
The volatility of
Indo-Pak ties is rooted in very complex issues and diplomacy, even though tortuous
and frustrating, is the best recourse when we consider a long-term strategy. Erecting
walls against the troublesome neighbour has not changed the situation but created
more roadblocks for New Delhi.
Clearly, India should
give utmost importance to its security and intelligence networks to prevent
another 26/11 and emphasize its resolve to fight terror at all bilateral and
multi-lateral forums. At the same time, it has to maintain open channels of engagements
so as to keep itself abreast of Islamabad’s
positions, always looking for opportunities to take conflict resolution to the
next level.
The nature of the
conflict between India and Pakistan is embedded
in our common past and the continuing developments have inextricably bound us
in this mess. One failure often snowballs to hurt composite relations. But,
incremental steps toward resolution of conflicts should not be sacrificed at
the altar of sinister campaigns out to divert the course of normalization.
The Foreign Secretary
Nirupama Rao aptly described the situation during her speech at the recent
Afghanistan-India-Pakistan Trialogue. She said, “Indo-Pak relations are,
by virtue of a complexity that has grown, rather than diminished over the
years, literally, a class apart. While some would trace the current state of
relations to the circumstances that led to the birth of two countries, others
would blame events thereafter, but what is important for us today is to try and
assess the reasons underlying the existing state of this relationship and to
think afresh on the way forward,” she added.
Chidambaram’s trip is important as he was the first Minister to visit Pakistan since
the 26/11 terror attack and the first Home Minister in three decades. In his
interactions with his Pak counterpart Malik an effort was made to exude
camaraderie despite the all-too obvious tension over the differences regarding Islamabad’s sincerity in
nailing the 26/11 perpetrator Hafiz Saeed and the intriguing deliberations on
the trial of others accused for the Mumbai attacks.
During
their talks both Ministers expressed confidence at the steps being taken to
start a new beginning. One of the significant announcements was that the
premier agencies of Pakistan
and India
— the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) and the Central Bureau of
Investigation (CBI) — will interact with each other on terrorism and the Mumbai
attacks.
Significantly,
Chidambaram concentrated on “outcomes” rather than Pakistan’s “intentions”. When
quizzed, he said: “Vigorous investigation and follow-up of leads available in
the Mumbai terror attacks. All masterminds and handlers must be brought to
book. We must ensure that terrorists don't have a free run of both countries and
make South Asia safe.”
Bluntly,
the prosecution of those involved in the Mumbai attacks was vital for Indo-Pak
relations and it was for Islamabad
to convey how the prosecution proceeds. Malik offered all assistance in taking
the case to its conclusion. But as Chidambaram underscored, “outcomes alone
will decide if we are on the right track.”
Undoubtedly, the absence
of talks is not going to stop another 26/11 from recurring. To stop such a
catastrophe again, all options should be kept on the table and a judicious mix
of hard and soft diplomacy be deployed. By no means is India a
trigger-happy nation and this is largely evident from its restraint in response
to the devastating terror attacks. A more belligerent New Delhi would have easily drawn the region
into a major conflict.
However, India’s
responsible attitude should not be taken lightly. This should be made
clear to Pakistan
during dialogue. Re-engaging in talks is both an opportunity and a challenge to remind Islamabad that confidence
building and engineering peace need two hands ready to make compromises and
concessions. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|