Home arrow Archives arrow Events and Issues arrow Events & Issues 2010 arrow Growth Perspective:CHALLENGES IN NEW DECADE, by Dhurjati Mukherjee,11 January 2010
 
Home
News and Features
INFA Digest
Parliament Spotlight
Dossiers
Publications
Journalism Awards
Archives
RSS
 
 
 
 
 
 
Growth Perspective:CHALLENGES IN NEW DECADE, by Dhurjati Mukherjee,11 January 2010 Print E-mail

Events & Issues

New Delhi, 11 January 2010  

Growth Perspective

CHALLENGES IN NEW DECADE

By Dhurjati Mukherjee

Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee recently stated that the growth this year would be around 7.5 per cent, while Prime Minister’s Economic Adviser Dr. C. Rangarajan, projected the economy would expand by 8 per cent during the next fiscal. The growth rate slipped from 9 per cent to 6.7 per sent during 2008-09 on account of the global recession. However, driven by stimulus packages and signs of recovery in the international market, the growth in the current fiscal is expected to be quite commendable, despite the poor contribution by the agricultural sector, which was plagued by droughts in several parts of the country.

The economy has, however, been facing other problems such as fiscal deficits, food inflation and unemployment. Though there are hopes of food inflation being steadily brought under control, deficits have been bothering the system. Some experts feel that subsidies need to be trimmed, leaks in disbursals through the massive welfare schemes plugged and improvement ensured in transparency and accountability. There is need to seriously ponder whether in a situation where over 35 per cent of the population languishes in poverty and squalor, welfare schemes targeted for this sector can be curtailed.

The other big worry is that economic growth hasn’t spurred job creation. One reason for this is the sharp increase in the labour force, which has grown around 2.95 per cent between 1999-2000 and 2004-06 – and has been double the population growth. Even though the employment growth rate had risen by 2.89 per cent during the same period, it was not sufficient to tackle the situation arising from unemployment and underemployment. The impact of NREGS cannot be doubted but it has not had the desired effect to transform the situation. 

It is well-known that liberalization resulted in the induction of labour-saving equipment, thereby causing lay-offs and ban on new recruitment. New service sector occupations have no doubt been coming up but the scope of jobs has become limited. There are apprehensions that compared to the large number of engineering colleges that have come up in the last few years, the job potential is much less as a saturation-like situation has already set in.

Indeed, the challenges for the new decade are enormous, principally because of the widening disparity between the rich and the poor, the urban and the rural sector and also the poor social infrastructure of the country, specially in the realm of healthcare and education. Both these sectors cannot be considered areas of profit but the poor and the economically weaker sections of the society must be provided facilities at minimum cost. Massive resources would obviously be needed if the Government is sincere to ensure 100 per cent literacy, proper homes for all (including those displaced) and adequate and affordable health care facilities.

How this will be done remains a big challenge before the Government but with India’s emergence as a super power, resources have to be marshaled in this direction. Developmental experts believe, and quite rightly, that even if there are deficits, funds for the welfare of the poor, the tribals and the backward communities cannot be curtailed for it is very much necessary to bring them into the mainstream of life and activity.

Apart from this, development of physical infrastructure is another crucial area, specially the construction of roads and ensuring connectivity to the interior districts of the country. Work in this sector has been going on and one can hope that this should be completed by the end of the present decade or even earlier.

But generation of power to the rural areas remains possibly the biggest challenge as there are 76 million rural households that are yet to switch on their first light bulb. Power Minister Sushil Kumar Shinde has stressed on rural electrification and making access to power across villages by the year 2012. Though this may take a few more years, determination and right policies may make this task possible. About Rs 5,000 crores was released for rural electrification in the 10th Plan and in the present Plan the amount has witnessed a quantum jump at Rs 38,000 crores.  

The Planning Commission estimated India will need to generate 700,000 MW of additional power by 2020 to meet the demands of a growing economy. The 2006 Expert Committee on Energy estimated the country’s power needs at 960,000 MW based on a 9 per cent GDP growth. Coal, hydel and non-conventional (or renewable) energy were expected to meet at best 75 per cent of the needs. While the thrust would need to be on renewable energy, specially solar power, nuclear power would also have to be developed.

The immediate driver to growth is investment, which has risen from 26 per cent of GSP in 1999-2000 to almost 40 per cent today, supported by a corresponding rise in both domestic savings and capital inflows from abroad. Most of the increase occurred during the previous decade’s second half, thus accounting for the sharp growth acceleration during the period. Significantly, private investment has doubled to over 28 per cent at present while public investment remained more or less static at around 9-10 per cent. It needs to be pointed out that though public investment has not grown, its composition has changed from investment in a wide range of manufacturing and services to more focused areas of infrastructure in recent years.  

 

What is imperative at this juncture is to ensure that the fruits of development reach all segments of society in a somewhat equal manner. The 11th Plan focused on ‘inclusive growth’ which the Prime Minister has been emphasizing time and again. But putting this into practice is indeed an uphill task which not only calls for prioritizing what is called ‘alternative development’ but also strengthening the panchayat system. Ensuring good end effective governance is the need of the day and with it more transparency and accountability of Government officials and politicians to make the system responsive to change.

The transformation of the rural sector particularly assumes a very crucial role and it has to be brought about by development of infrastructure facilities, incentives to the farming community, special attention for skill development for rural artisans and development of horticulture, floriculture and other agro-based industries. It may be useful that the suggestions of the expert group formed on agricultural indebtedness (under the chairmanship of Dr. Radhakrishnan, Director, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research) need to be considered seriously specially on increasing agricultural productivity, enhancing investments in agricultural infrastructure, research and extension and putting in place an effective system of rural mitigation, both in production and marketing.

Lab-to-land approach is yet to become effective and thus research from agricultural universities and the Indian Council Agricultural Research (ICAR) should reach the farm sector. It is quite obvious that rural regeneration would no doubt improve the condition of a major section of the population and make it an effective work force. One may recall the observation of Dr. C. Rangarajan  way back in 1982: a mere one per cent increase in agricultural output led to a 0.7 increase in the national income, most of it which reached the developmental needs of rural India. ---INFA

(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)

 

< Previous   Next >
 
   
     
 
 
  Mambo powered by Best-IT