Round The States
New Delhi, 25 February 2010
Maoists, Jharkhand
& Bihar
CENTRE AT LOOSE END
IN WAR
By Insaf
The Centre has done much-needed rethinking on an agreed
national policy to fight Naxalism, as strongly pleaded by Insaf last week. Union Home Minister P Chidambaram has called a meeting
in Delhi of the Chief Ministers of W. Bengal, Bihar and Jharkhand since the latter two had failed to
attend the Kolkatta meeting on February 9. However, indications so far are that
Chief Ministers, Nitish Kumar of Bihar and Shibu Soren of Jharkhand are unwilling
to play ball. Likewise, the Centre has made little headway in getting the
Maoists to stop operations for “72-hours’ and accept its offer for unconditional
talks. On Monday last, days after the Silda camp attack, the Maoist leader,
Kishenji proposed a “72-day” ceasefire, which Chidambaram rejected saying there
could be no “ifs and buts” for talks. Kishenji has offered that there would be
no left-wing violence if the security forces stopped their operations in
Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand and Orissa and intellectuals
and human rights’ outfits facilitated the talks. The deadline for the ceasefire
said the leader would begin on February 25 (observed as Martyrs day by the Maoists)
and end on May 7.
However, Chidambaram has said if the Maoists are willing to
abjure violence without conditions they could fax their truce offer to him on
011-23093155. But Kishenji has said: If he wants to talk on our proposal let
him speak to me on my number 09734695789. Who blinks first only time will tell.
Meanwhile, Chidambaram has also written to Nitish and Soren saying that the
Centre has reached some “tentative conclusions” on tackling the Maoists menace.
But before these conclusions are translated into decisions and implemented it
is necessary to be assured that the State Governments fully endorse the plan. While
there is no official response so far, Nitish has maintained that “If the Naxals
offer talks, the Government may consider.” This apart, he has shown reluctance
towards launching any major anti-naxal offensive in Bihar,
as it is “not as seriously affected by the Naxal challenge as some other States
are.” Soren too has advocated that “instead of launching the offensive,
accelerating the process of development in the rural areas would be a better
proposition”. What next?
* * * *
Outrage Against
Humanity
Led by Punjab and its Sikh
community, the whole country has reacted sharply to the beheading of two Sikh
youths by the Taliban militia in the North Western Province of Pakistan. Chief
Minister Prakash Singh Badal has denounced the incident as an “outrage against
humanity” and appealed to Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to take up the issue
directly with Pakistan
and ensure the release of the Sikh community held hostage by the Taliban.
President of the Shiromani Akali Dal, Sukhbir Singh Badal, who is also Deputy
Chief Minister of Punjab and incharge of the Home portfolio, said denounced the
attack on the Sikhs as an attack on all Indians and urged New
Delhi to build up international pressure on Pakistan to
force it to take stern action against the culprits. He also expressed concern
over increasing attacks on the Punjabis in general and the Sikhs in particular
in various countries, including the UK,
Australia and, now, Pakistan.
Importantly, he accused the Ministry of External Affairs of soft-pedalling
these serious attacks. This had sent an unfortunate message that India was
hardly bothered about the life and security of its citizens working abroad.
Time for New Delhi
to sit up!
* * * *
Gujarat’s “Communal” Woes
A simple random draw of lots for homes in Ahmedabad has
sadly reiterated that Gujarat is a deeply
polarized State. Last week, while relocating some 8,000-odd families and evacuees
of the Sabarmati River Front project under the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban
Renewal Mission this stark reality hit the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation
(AMC). It found that the computer-generated allotment of homes was not
acceptable to both Hindus and Muslims, who have written to authorities,
including Chief Minister Narendra Modi, asking for re-allotment. They have said
that they don’t wish to live in an area dominated by the other as it would be “communally
unsafe”. Apparently, the new locations are among the areas which witnessed large-scale
violence during the 2002 riots. The Muslim evacuees insist they want to move to
Muslim-dominated Vatva area, while the Hindus want to be re-allotted to the Hindu-held
Vadaj. But the AMC does not want to get involved. It has advised both the
communities to exchange the allotment homes among themselves if they feel
insecure. Unhappy with the response, the evacuees have threatened to seek “court
intervention if this goes on.”
* * * *
J&K Tough on
Stone-Pelters
The Jammu & Kashmir government is leaving no stone
unturned to control the thousands of protestors the security forces have to
face every other day. Last week, the Omar Abdullah government decided to slap
the Public Safety Act (PSA) against stone-pelters and arrest them for “waging
war against the State,” a crime punishable with death or life in jail. Over the
past week, it has slapped the PSA against eight stone-pelters, all between 15
and 18 years of age, while 16 youth are being tried under Section 121 of CrPC
(waging war against the State). Statistics reveal that over the past
year-and-a-half nearly 1,500 CRPF jawans have been injured in stone pelting
incidents and around 373 vehicles damaged. The police say the stone-pelting
sessions are organized by ring leaders and funded by Separatists, which
explains how such protests start simultaneously at several places across the
Valley. Though both the Separatists and the Opposition were quick in denouncing
the Government’s decision, the death of an 11-day old baby in a stone pelting incident
in Baramulla has silenced them so far.
* * * *
EC To Verify BSP
Statues
Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister and BSP supremo Mayawati’s ‘elephantine’
problem is far from over. On Monday
last, the Supreme Court asked the Election Commission to decide whether the controversial
statues of elephants at memorial and parks, built at the cost of cores of
rupees from the State exchequer, amounted to putting up the party’s “election
symbol.” And, whether this amounted to a violation of the model code of conduct?
The apex court has granted the Commission three months to give its verdict. However,
in its response to the Public Interest Litigation filed, the UP government has
maintained that it had already told the EC that the statues “are not election
symbol of the Party as alleged but a welcome symbol”. It also asserted that the
intent behind the statues was similar to that of “North Block and South Block
here (on Raisina Hill in New Delhi).
You have elephant statues too.” In addition, the UP counsel argued that statues
of elephants are also found in temples and that “the distinction is quite
clear.” While the apex court said it was still bothered and it was necessary to
find a “solution”, will this argument hold good with the EC is the big
question.
* * * *
Highway To Sikkim
Sikkim was recently baled out by the
Supreme Court, which barred the Gorkha Janmukti Morcha or other agitators from
blocking in any way the sole highway 31A that links the State with the rest of
the country. Mercifully for Gangtok, the Centre has followed up the Apex Court’s
direction with much-needed action. It has decided to deploy Central police
forces in north Bengal to monitor and ensure that the national highway to
Sikkim, a stretch of which passes through the Darjeeling hills, remains clear
of blockades in times of strife in the hills. One company of the Central
Reserve Police Force is on its way and another two companies will follow.
Meanwhile, the GJM continues to play hot and cold. At times, it indicates
willingness to conciliate. Yet last week, GJM supporters went on the rampage in
Kurseong, attacking the police thana and setting ablaze police vehicles as well
as the residence of the local MLA, Shanta Chhetri, who belongs to Subhash Ghising’s
Gorkha National Liberation Front. This could vitiate the climate for the
proposed tripartite talks in New Delhi.
---INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|