Sunday Reading
New Delhi, 30 November 2009
Museum
Consciousness
ENGAGE WITH MOHALLAS
By Suraj Saraf
For long there has been a clamour that museums in India have
been just inert entities -- lifeless repositories, not managed in a proper
manner, of the dead past. Thus, concerned circles have been pressing that these
institutions be made “live and active” to serve their purpose of edutainment
(education and entertainment) of the community around.
Thankfully a note was made by those responsible. Three years
ago things were set moving to streamline the museums’ set-up to make them serve
the purpose they were meant for. As
remarked by the then Union Tourism and Cultural Minister Ambika Soni, “our
museums need massive face-lift to meet the needs of the changing times. So we
have finalised an action plan to upgrade them”.
Elaborating, she had said, “Though we have a rich collection
of artifacts, their display is not up to the mark. There is need for better
presentation of these art objects. Some of our museums do not have enough space
to keep these. There is need for expansion.” Obviously, all this is aimed at ensuring that
the numbers of visitors increase. For example, the National Museum
has a large collection of artifacts, but how many see these? There is need to create
a better ambience and proper display with better lighting and colour schemes.
Pertinently, its Director General Dr. K.K. Chakravorty had
then said, “The whole country is a museum. Museums are only extensions of the
living museums and must not stop at displaying objects. They have to connect
with the hinterlands. The National Museums needs to give direction to other
museums and act as catalysts.”
Indeed, some museums have great objects and are capable of
becoming very good museums, but don’t know how to spend the funds. They think
that improvement means building new structures. Some others don’t even know how
to lobby for funds. The aim should clearly be to help them -- to make museums
relevant to the community. Additionally, there is need to step up the community’s
involvement in the museums and vice versa. If the museum is not interested in
the ‘mohalla’, why will the latter be
interested in it?
However, experts feel this involvement of the mohalla is not easy. And forcing
children into the dusty corridors of museums is definitely not the answer. With
the number of people visiting the museums, and most clearly competing with
various kinds of entertainment, the future lies in not only keeping alive the
world of the past but also interacting with the world of today.
Given this background, it was considered appropriate to
consult the museums across the country and come up with concrete solutions for
the Government. The National
Museum thus started
holding workshops with small museums to start a dialogue. And for a change, it also
involved the outside experts to bid for the modernisation process to make the
repositories of heritage more pertinent to the people they belong to.
The ambitious project was said to aim at bringing all
museums up to international standards. It envisaged a holistic upgradation from
architectural renovations, display systems to contextual visitor interpretation
and storage. With many museums just adding mere buildings in the name of
modernisation, instead of improving basic facilities like signage, display or
even lighting, the National Museums sought to bring about a change that is not
superficial. The idea was to build capacity of these museums “within their
existing resources”.
In order to achieve its goal, the Centre for the first time recently
announced that voluntary organizations, trusts etc which were registered under
the Registration of Societies Act could seek financial assistance up to Rs.3
crore or 80 per cent of the total project expenditure for setting up, promotion
and modernisation of regional and local museums. The remaining 20 per cent along
with the land for setting up the museum would be the onus of the State
governments. Besides, allocation for existing museums has been increased four-fold
from Rs 60 lakhs to Rs.2.5 crore.
The significance of this scheme became apparent when the
Chairman of Australia’s Network for Cultural Heritage Services, V Daniel
brought home the point: “Throughout the world museum structures and buildings
are expanding their space which has meant a huge increase in their maintenance
and running cost, but the Government spending on art and heritage has remained
static… We need to think of some way to make museums economically viable.”
Delivering a lecture at the Indian National Trust for Art
and Cultural Heritage (INTACH), he provided a snapshot of emerging trends, of how
museums are changing in the international context and the accompanying
challenges facing them all over the world. Accordingly, he suggested that
providing virtual access to museums through website holds tremendous promise
for sustaining them in future. An example is that of the Australian Museum.
It gets about 55,000 to 40,000 visitors every year. However, there are about 20
million visitors through the website which is a huge change as the figure is
doubling every six months.
INTACH Chief S.K. Misra regretted that “in India museum
consciousness has not developed at par with other countries. Here there is
tendency among people to visit museums more as a social event than due to a
genuine interest. This is why it is difficult to generate much income from
museums. The concept of having exclusive museum shops storing gift items needs
to be developed here too. ”
Thus, the first challenge before the museums is to make conservation
and preservation relevant to today’s society. Heritage preservation needs to
move internationally from an elitist role to something everyone can understand
and benefit from.
The next challenge is to preserver both tangible and intangible
heritage. Still another challenge is to realise that cultural conservation is
as much about people as it is about monuments and artifacts. Moreover,
something needs to be done to make youngsters connect with museums.
Internationally, museum administrators are reinventing them to reconnect with
communities. Imagine the excitement if a museum in India were to showcase Sachin
Tendulkar’s bat.
It would be pertinent to recall here what Pt. Nehru had
underscored about the role of museums, while inaugurating the National Museum
way back in 1955. Declaring that museums were not meant as “houses of curios”
but places of education, he said these were meant to inform the people on the
progress of humanity through centuries. He emphasised that special facilities
be provided at the museums to the youth and children for learning about human
history through proper use of films, drawings etc. In fact, visits to museums
should form an important part of the curriculum of studies. “The extent to
which the museums had attracted people, not for entertainment but for education
should be one of the tests of the success of the museum officials,” was his
advice.
At the same function, Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad, the then
Education Minister, had hoped that the National Museum
would be “a faithful guardian of our past and a guarantor of our future.” It
was his hope that the National
Museum would represent
every aspect of Indian history and culture and became truly national. –INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|