Open Forum
New Delhi, 21 August 2009
Why India’s
Partition?
LET’S GET OUR HISTORY RIGHT
By P K Nigam
(Author of book, “Reflections on the History of World in 20th
Century”)
Common impression in India and the world is that Atlee and the Labour
Party were good and wanted to give India independence after WW II, but
due to differences among Indian leaders, they had to divide the country. This
belief is based on the British version and is totally false. History books in the UK, the US,
and even in India
are based on this description. The truth is England did NOT want its raj to end,
particularly Atlee, Cripps, the Labour Party and Churchill. Thus, it propagated
this version to hide the guilt. One million Indians died and 12 million forced
to migrate due to the British plan to partition India.
This false version of history
is very injurious to India.
It is time we learn our true history, so we can defend ourselves and not repeat
mistakes. Independence was not due to the goodwill
of England
but due to balance of military force. Very few people understand the truth because
of their lack of knowledge of geo-politics. Even most leaders were and are ignorant,
e.g. Maulana Azad, now Jaswant Singh, Advani and Sudhir Ghosh, who acted as
Gandhiji’s emissary for negotiations with the Labour Government for transfer of
power during 1945-47.
To understand 1946-48
history, it is necessary to know a few ideas. Mao said that political power
comes from the barrel of a gun. This has always been true in the past, is true today,
and will be in future. Idealism has no place in politics, which concerns power
– how to get it and use it. An imperial power rules by the policy of “divide
and rule”. Previously, it ruled the subject country directly and exploited it,
but as this became unpopular, imperialism changed its form into
neo-imperialism. Divide and rule thus became “divide and dominate.”
Gandhiji used to describe
the British policy of divide and rule as monkey justice from an Aesop’s
fable. It was about two cats fighting for
the just division of a loaf of bread who went to a monkey for the needful. The latter
deliberately kept dividing the bread into unequal pieces so that the cats would
object. The two did, and in the end found that the monkey had eaten all the
bread while pretending to divide it equally.
On
December 21, 1945, when Viceroy Wavell went to London, he met labour Minister Ernest Bevin
on December 21, 1945. He writes that Bevin like everyone else hated the idea of
leaving India,
but had no alternative to suggest. He, however, said that the US was much worried about India and did not want England to
leave it. Wavell replied that the US
had changed its policy, now they could hardly expect British to face another Palestine in India,
because it suited American commercial interest that Britain
should remain in India.
Clearly, the British and even the US did not want the raj to end.
There
were many reasons put together why Britain
had to give India
independence. Gandhi’s Satyagraha movements in the ‘20s and ‘30s, the
widespread Quit India movement in 1942, formation of the Indian National Army
by Subhas Chandra Bose, trial of INA officers, the mutiny, sending of Indian
army to Indo-China and Indonesia to take surrender for Japan, expansion of
Indian army to 2.5 lakhs to fight expected Japanese invasion of India etc made
Wavell realise that he could not trust the Indian Army’s loyalty and that England
could not rule India militarily.
Moreover,
England
had become very weak economically and militarily after the war. A year after
it’s declaration of war against Germany
in 1939, it found it had spent most of its gold and dollar reserves and had to
depend on the US
for money and arms to carry on the war. Hence, Wavell made a blue print of Pakistan in December 1945 and sent it to
Secretary of State for India
in a secret letter, which has now been made public. It reveals that partition
was necessary to protect British interests in Asia and NOT Muslim interests as
believed in India and Pakistan. The
aim was to protect Near East from Soviet expansion to the Indian
Ocean and the oil wells there. The English had been working on the
creation of Pakistan
since 1888.
A
Cabinet Delegation was sent to India
in March 1946 ostensibly to help Indians become free, but actually to make them
agree to Partition. To further the aim, the English made Jinnah start communal
riots to prove that Hindus and Muslims cannot live together and the country must
be divided. By now, though the British were powerless to control India, they had
enough authority to create trouble before leaving. To defeat the Congress’
demand for a free united India,
England threatened to leave India in more
than 500 pieces, if it didn’t agree to Partition. .
Sardar
Patel had become in-charge of Home in the provisional government in September
1946. He read all secret government papers and found how the British were planning
to make India weak before leaving,
and decided it was better to accept India in two parts rather than over
500. In December 1946, he made V.P. Menon make a blue print of partition, which
was different from Wavell’s partition plan. It was this plan, which was
ultimately adopted in August 1947. Patel talked to Nehru, but the latter said
that Gandhiji would never agree.
Gandhiji
had realized the harm to India
from partition and declared it would take place over his dead body. He was even
willing to have a civil war to prevent it. Patel told Nehru he would make
Gandhiji agree. Both went to him and spelt out Patel’s idea. Gandhiji asked
them if they had become afraid due to loss of lives in the raging communal
riots. The two replied in the negative, but facts had to be faced. And that it
would be better to accept partition. Gandhiji agreed to partition on condition
that it would be a partition between two brothers.
However,
the wily English defeated Gandhiji’s wish by creating the Kashmir
problem so that the two nations would keep fighting. Later in November 1947, Patel
explained the logic for the acceptance. He said that with Partition 80 % of India would be
free and would develop economically and militarily and then take the other 20%.
Partition
took place on August 14-15, 1947. All top civil and military officers were
British in Pakistan.
They made a plan for Pakistan
to attack Kashmir, which had not decided which
Dominion to accede. This made the Maharaja and the National Conference to seek India’s help.
After accepting accession, the Indian army was sent to prevent the Pakistani invaders
from occupying Kashmir. During the fighting, Mountbatten
asked Congress leaders not to attack Pakistan but to complain to the UN.
Gandhiji, Nehru and Patel were against this, but later Nehru had to agree as Britain put the pressure by reducing supply of
arms and petrol to India.
As expected, the UN, dominated by the US
and England did not declare Pakistan as an
aggressor, but appointed a mediator (i.e. justice monkey). Pakistan was never declared an aggressor and
continues to occupy parts of Kashmir.
To
say that Jinnah created Pakistan
is a joke. Jinnah had no gun to get political power. Jinnah was ignorant and he
allowed the British to use him to divide the country. Later, just before his
death he realized his mistake and wanted India
and Pakistan
to unite. Jinnah may be called second Mir Jafar. ---INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|