Open Forum
New Delhi, 8 June 2009
Left In Distress
URGENT OVERHAUL NEEDED
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
The Left Front is in dire distress
and many believe that they are in a state of disarray. The snapping of ties
with the UPA Government had been a great strategic mistake, as pointed out by
former Lok Sabha Speaker Somnath Chatterjee.
In fact, the Congress is extremely
happy of not having to take the Left’s support as it would have jeopardized its
relations with Mamta’s Trinamool and
opened the possibility of it interfering
in most decisions. The Third Front too is virtually a non-starter given that
BSP’s Mayawati is ready to extend outside support to the UPA.
According to a former Chief
Secretary of West Bengal, the CPM is likely to
be cornered further in the coming years. Primarily due to its General Secretary
Prakash Karat’s lack of political maturity and insight along with his
arrogance. This could land the Party in great difficulty. Predictably, Karat is
being cornered and criticized by his Party-men and it remains to be seen
whether his position will remain unchanged in the Party’s hierarchy.
Adding to the Left woes, the
pre-poll issues in West Bengal and Kerala
created problems for the Party. Leaving the people disillusioned and
dissatisfied with its performance and bickerings within the Party. As the
results show, both the urban and rural masses rejected its policies. Worse, the
Congress-Trinamool pact consolidated the opposition leading to their resounding
victory. Bagging an unexpected 25 of the 42 MP seats in West
Bengal.
The 7 causes that went against the
Left are: One, acquisition of farmland for industrial purposes when barren land
and land of closed companies was lying unutilized. Two, the Adivasi agitation
against wanton neglect and no development in tribal-dominated areas. Three, a
large section of the West Bengal Muslims were upset with Left policies. Four,
the Rizbanur episode.
Five, the distressing condition of
education and heath facilities in villages and the pro-capitalist approach to
development ignoring the interests of the people of the State. Six,
under-utilization of Central funds, inept handling of the rural employment
guarantee scheme and rural development programmes not properly carried out.
Lastly, projects were held-up thanks to Party interference, corruption and
The controversy for the need of
farmland to develop industry as advocated by the CPM was rejected by the
people. From south of Kolkata northwards across hundreds of kilometers on both
sides of the river Hooghly, which was India’s one of the first industrial
complexes, is now a rust belt.
Most factories are closed, machinery peddled-off and workers
laid-off. In fact, over 1.6 lakh crores land is locked in litigation. In the
last five years, the Left Front Government has closed down quite a few
undertakings leaving over 6000 workers unemployed.
Pertinently, a section of the CPM, led by the State Land
Reforms Minister Abdus Rezzak Mollah, had from the very beginning opposed the
Party’s policy of the hasty takeover of farmland for industrial use. After the
election, the CPM transferred back the Land-Use Board to Mollah from the
Industry Department so that future acquisitions would be done keeping in view
the interests of the land losers.
If one were to compare West Bengal with Maharashtra
they are completely different. India’s
commercial Capital Mumbai managed to redevelop its mill areas into bustling
centres of trade, manufacturing and commerce. Questions have rightly been
raised as to why the West Bengal Government has not been able to follow
Mumbai’s model and instead opted for farmland to set-up industries.
Adding to the Left Front’s woes, it floated the Third Front
with Mayawati’s BSP and Jayalalithaa’s AIADMK. Two controversial leaders facing
corruption charges. Thus the Front was viewed as an opportunistic alliance and
rejected by the people. Questionably, how could the CPM which had demanded a
CBI enquiry against Jaylalithaa in Parliament, align with her?
Not only that. Many Leftists and intellectuals have
questioned the marked change in the Party’s ideological position and its
electoral strategy. People like wrier Mahasweta Debi, actor Aparna Sen etc have
been openly criticizing the CPM for its anti-people policies and complete
developmental failure. Wherein the Party’s popularity has been on a wane across
the country.
Besides, apart from the Congress, the Maoists are enraged
with the CPM for its change of orientation in the economic policies. They
allege that both in West Bengal and Kerala, the
Left Front has played into the hands of industrialists and multi-nationals.
Ignoring in the process the demands and needs of the rural poor, specially the
farming community, small artisans, weavers etc which has led to its ignominious
defeat.
According to a report, the CPM’s assets which were Rs 52
crores in 2002 more than doubled to Rs 107 crores in 2006. Many wonder how a
Party with only 43 MPs in Lok Sabha accumulated so much money in just 4 years.
More. The CPM has the third largest assets after the Congress (Rs 229 crores)
and the BJP (Rs 112 crores). Not a few believe that these, acquired in an
‘unclean’ manner, are more than officially shown. They could presently range
between Rs 700-Rs 900 crores.
There are also reports of large-scale corruption in the
Party, especially amongst the middle and lower level cadres who work more for
themselves than for carrying out grass-root development. Veteran Leftists
pointed out that the Left Front, specially the CPM is no different from any
other Party. There is no commitment and sincerity among Party cadres, no
discipline in the P riddled by large-scale corruption and greed at all levels.
Recall, the Left came to power in Kerala and West Bengal promising to work for the uplift of the
farmers and workers. After three decades, both these sections are angry and
restive. Most Left veterans are dead or inactive and the current leaders have
no experience, initiative or imagination to lead the seething population. Thus,
when faced with opposition or distress, the Front reacted with overwhelming
force, hoping to intimidate dissent with violence. Nandigram a case in point.
The primarily reason for the CPM’s rejection by the rural masses.
A political commentator aptly observed, Communists never
believe in democratic norms. Yet they always talk of “people’s democracy” but
do the opposite. Curb dissent and everything else with an iron hand instead of
through dialogue and discussion.
Alas as Verdict 2009 shows this strategy has failed. It is
time now for the Left Front, specially the CPM, to introspect, bury their
differences and emphasize on grass root development of the masses in West Bengal and Kerala, if they want to recover their
lost position. Moreover, the structure and character of its leadership has to
change so as to accommodate with better grace the demands that pluralist
democracy makes on every political Party. True this appears remote in the
short-term. But only time will tell how quickly they would be able to achieve
the objectives. ---- INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|