Open Forum
New Delhi, 18 April 2009
New Vote Slogans
CAN MPs TRULY USHER
IN CHANGE?
By Deepak Thimaya
‘Your vote can make a difference’, ‘Vote for your future’.
Many more such slogans carefully worded, attractive sounding and directed to
the thinking man’s heart this election are a laudable exercise and must be
supported and encouraged. But, what difference will our votes make and what
different future is our vote going to ensure us are simple questions most
votaries of ‘don’t waste your vote’ campaigns are unable to answer.
Do the elected MPs, whether illiterate, ignorant, Harvard-educated
or celebrated, have any role in Parliament, apart from perhaps getting their 10
to 30 minutes due in the entire term of a Lok Sabha? If we are sending
intelligent MPs to debate in Parliament, is there actually anything to debate there
at all? Recent instances when 17 Bills were passed in less than 12 minutes do
not speak ill of Parliament and the MPs but only mirror the current system,
where MPs do not have any role in the process of legislation, even if they wanted
to.
The most shocking thing about Indian politicians is not
about corruption, misuse of power or lack of interest in public good, but a total
lack of knowledge of the Indian Constitution, which is the reason and the basis
on which they get elected.
The MPs not having executive powers is something not only
they and their electorate, but even most journalists don’t know. Expecting too
much from an MP is not only ridiculous but undermines the very purpose of
electing them. For the desperate need of electing most MPs is that they promise
heaven and earth to their voters. However, they end up doing very little and are
a butt of ridicule by the both the Press and the public.
Recently, an economist remarked that apart from
participating in intra party fora and discussing issues with the executive
authorities and perhaps putting political pressure on the Government for
sanction of funds, there is very little an MP can do with all his personal
capabilities and credentials. At best he can only vote for his party or his Government
as the case maybe.
This apart, ten crores is a pittance to be spent on a
constituency in five years, with all the cuts and commissions to be paid to
execute MPLAD works. Even an MP from the ruling party cannot impress upon the Government
to do more for his constituency in a scenario where development and release of
funds is based on who needs it the most to keep the government afloat. All thanks
to the absence of a single party government or a government of coalition of
selfish interests.
Thus, blaming an MP for not representing his constituency
efficiently in Parliament or with his Government in the Centre is naive on part
of any critic. When asked why an MP should not be candid about his pitiable
inability to play his role as the true elected representative, the answer is: ‘Do
you think anyone will vote for me if I tell them I have no powers and I
actually cannot do anything?’
The usual allegations against an incumbent MP is that he has
done nothing much for the development of his constituency. Is it actually the
job of an MP to do developmental works in his constituency? Does he have the
executive authority or does he have the sanction for it in the Constitution?
How can one expect such a preposterous delivery from an MP, who among other
marginal roles is just a representative in the highest platform of democracy in
the country?
While we are all so proud of being the world’s biggest
democracy, we must at the same time be ashamed of the farce of this election.
The elections are conducted according to the whims and fancies of political
parties, who collectively have coded an unwritten constitution that functions
quite oblivious of the Constitution of the land. The very idea of a representative in the
Parliament has nothing in common with the idea of a development agent that the
voters expect to see in an MP.
Policy making takes place at the highest level in political
parties and most often is not even discussed with the back benchers, who are
just expected to support it whether they agree with it or not. Even if a right
thinking, intelligent and qualified MP has an opinion opposed to that of the
Party, it is of little significance as at any time the party only needs to take
into consideration pleasing powerful leaders, coalition interests, opposition scrutiny
and the next elections.
Viability, future of the nation, media opinion and academic
ratification are not the priorities of any party which wants to either retain power
or win the next election. So what does an MP do? The best he/she can do is, be
in good terms with the party bosses, make friends among powerful leaders, not
antagonize the opposition to the point of enmity, network with powerful
business leaders and power brokers, go on foreign study tours, get into a few
house committees, make some money for the next elections et al and finally wait
and try to get elected again.
So, does our vote matter? Even if 20 MPs are elected by a
majority of educated and well-informed voters, they may not belong to the same
party and therefore, what is the difference they can make? What future will a
few extra votes bring about for the country? Also, there is a new interest among
the IT circles of casting their vote this election. But are they serious? One
could not help but sit in bewilderment while watching a voter- candidate
interaction, wherein some techies were more interested to know what he could do
about pub deadlines, if elected. If these are the new voters, what kind of
change are we talking about?
We all know that there was less corruption in Nehru’s time
than there is today. If we are talking about the future, then by simple
calculations we can confidently say that the level of corruption will only be
more and not less. As of now a sustained campaign to get the educated to vote appears
a futile exercise as there is no guarantee that this class will vote for better
candidates. Most Germans were educated enough when they supported Hitler. Sixty
years hence the human blunder, meaning of education has changed little.
Sadly, electing an MP has the basis of the Constitution, but
not its spirit. Politicians use it only to quote from as they have their own rule
book to follow. The voters too go by their own rules before they elect someone.
It is time we understand our Constitution or else slogans will only remain
slogans. –INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|