Open Forum
New Delhi, 28 March 2009
Model Code of
Conduct
FRESH LOOK COULD BE
WORTHWHILE
By T.D. Jagadesan
The Varun Gandhi ‘hate speech’ controversy is over insofar
the Election Commission is concerned. It had left it to the BJP whether to or
not to accept its advisory i.e. “not to field” Varun as its candidate for
violation of the model code of conduct. The Commission, however, came under
criticism from some legal quarters “for going beyond its jurisdiction.”
Be that as it may, it would presumably need to tread
carefully in regard to cases of violation of the code so that its words carry
weight. In fact, post this Lok Sabha elections a fresh look at certain aspects
of the code along with deficiencies in the law could be an exercise worth
taking. For one, few would have missed the sternness of the Chief Election
Commissioner’s declaration that the model code of conduct come into operation
immediately after the announcement of the schedule for General Election 2009.
This means that the code will last for two-and-half months.
Even after the results of the election are announced on May 16 there may be a
few more days of interim government. June 1 is the date when the term of the
Lok Sabha expires and therefore the parties can wait till this date in order to
complete the formalities of formulating a common minimum programme and
distribution of portfolios among the members of the coalition government.
This would amount to a delay of three months for the regular
government to be formed and start working without any of the constraints of the
model code. Three months by any reckoning are an unusually long period when the
business of governance is conducted without taking decisions on even the most
important development projects.
It is true that India’s electorate has increased
from 671 million in 2004 to 714 million in 2009 and the number of polling
stations has increased from 6,87,402 to 8,28,804 during the same period. There
are also pressing problems of law and order which have to be taken care of
through deployment of adequate security and polling personnel. However, too
large a number of days under the regime of the model code can certainly affect
the efficiency of the government.
It is important to remember that elections are held at three
levels in the statues --- panchayats, State Assemblies and the Lok Sabha. On
all these occasions the model code comes into force and one can imagine the
extent of delays and also the substantial increases in administrative expenditure
because of certain provisions in the code relating to development projects.
An attempt was made by the government in 2000 to make the
model code applicable only from the date of the formal notification of each
phase of election. The government tried to get a favourable decision from the
Supreme Court and a petition was filed against the ruling of the Commission. But
the Government withdrew its petition in the court eventually and the code of
conduct now comes into force with the announcement of the election.
The code lays down certain well-intentioned guidelines about
the conduct of the people during elections. It prescribes certain dos and
don’ts regarding conduct of meetings, processions, caution in speeches etc, as
part of the election campaign. However, there are certain instructions in the
model code which, in effect prevent any move by the party in power to implement
the projects necessary for the welfare of the people. It prevents even laying
foundation stones for projects already included in the annual plan and for
which provision exists in the Budget. Its “don’ts” result in postponement of
projects such as constructions of new roads providing drinking water etc, even
though their beneficiaries are the common people.
Those who have followed the manner in which the model code
of conduct has been operating would have noticed that the general practice is
to put on hold action on all the elections are over. It is time that some of
these provisions in the model code are removed and suitable changes are
introduced to ensure that elections do not become a cause for delays in the
development process.
The Commission may have this in mind, as recently it has
allowed the UPA government to go ahead and float tenders for new projects and
release fresh funds, even as the code was in place. The reason cited .by the
government was that award of projects required continuation to mitigate the
impact of the economic slowdown. While the EC has made some relaxations for
flagship schemes such as the National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme,
National Rural Health Mission, Bharat Nirman etc, it is important that
guidelines are given a fresh look to avoid any controversy viz sops being
offered under the code. .
Another important reform that could go down well to ensure
that the normal work of governance is not affected by elections is to revert to
the old system of simultaneous election to the Lok Sabha and the State
legislatures. The administrative cost for conducting polls has been steadily
increasing with every election and the government has to be vigilant that its own
expenditure on elections does not get out of control while it continues to
advise candidates and political parties to observe the prescribed limits on
election expenses.
Apart from the heavy cost involved on security personnel,
quite a large number of government employees are disturbed from their normal
duties by drafting them to election duties. Teachers constitute the largest
group of election personnel in our country. It is a well-known fact that
primary schools in India, particularly those run by the government, are grossly
understaffed.
Simultaneous elections for the State and Central government
will reduce the burden on the teachers and other government employees
considerably without in any way affecting the efficiency of the work relating
to elections. Some opponents of simultaneous elections have expressed
apprehensions that the personnel drafted for election duty may find it
difficult to manage such elections. But this is only an imaginary apprehension.
It is well-known that most political parties do not maintain
in proper accounts and even if some parties maintain accounts they are not
audited by those qualified to do so. Thus the whole concept of a ceiling for
expenditure is vitiated and no effective action has been taken for submission
of wrong accounts by the elected candidates. It would be worthwhile to eliminate
such deficiencies. As elections are a continuing process so should be the electoral
reforms. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|