Open Forum
New Delhi, 6 March 2009
Separate Telangana State
BRAZEN CONSENSUS
CHARADE
By T.D. Jagadesan
All the major political parties in Andhra Pradesh, excepting
the Congress, have come out clearly in favour of the formation of a separate
Telangana state. Even within the Congress Party, most leaders, including
legislators, ministers in the State as well as at the Centre belonging to
Telangana, are in its favour, but are not forthcoming.
The State Reorganisation Commission (SRC), which recommended
in 1956 the formation of a separate Hyderabad
State consisting of
Telangana, referred to the consensus reached among the Telangana people
themselves. It further recommended that after five years, Telangana could be
merged with Andhra if two-third of the Telangana legislators opted for it. But
consensus has now come to mean not a consensus among the people of Telangana
but among everybody else at the national and state level.
The Committee headed by Pranab Mukherjee is supposed to be
working towards building the consensus. But the Congress’ own position on
Telangana is not made crystal clear. If it is ‘No’ then this exercise is
unnecessary. If ‘yes’, it would make the exercise positive and meaningful. Even
if a second SRC were to be constituted, as per the Congress Election Manifesto
of 2004, the party could not have remained non-committal on the issue, as every
party would have been obliged to make its position clear to the SRC.
Had the Congress supported statehood for Telangana, it would
have introduced a bill in Lok Sabha. If it was unable to introduce such a Bill
due to a lack or consensus in the UPA, then the people would have understood
the constraints. But the Congress Party’s own position has not been made absolutely
clear throughout the past five years.
The real explanation for the Congress not taking a stand is
the ‘veto’ exercised by a few leaders in power in the State ever since the
formation of Andhra Pradesh. In fact, this demonstrates how some individuals can
manipulate the levers of power in a large and heterogeneous state by the sheer
dint of resources and power at their command. Though they have been saying that
they will abide by the decision of their High Command on Telangana, one is left
wondering whether the High Command they talk of is in Delhi
or in Hyderabad
itself.
Telangana is indeed, a national issue, not just a regional
one. It actually reflects the on-going social change in the country for the
empowerment of people through decentralized governance by broadening and
deepening our democratic system. Such empowerment and governance would enable
articulation of the real problems of the people, resulting in a socially
inclusive Telangana. Inclusiveness could not be achieved so far in the bigger state
of Andhra Pradesh because the entrenched interests were perpetuated and the
voice of the disadvantaged sections remained fragmented.
Tribals are the most disadvantaged section socially and economically
with negligible political voice. They live in remote areas and are subjected to
land alienation on a large scale. So far, hardly any initiative has been taken
in Andhra Pradesh to restore their land despite strong recommendations made by
a high-level committee constituted by the present Government. Consequently, the
administration is alienated from the people and the areas became a breeding
ground for extremist activities.
Yet, this has been treated as a law and order problem and
not as the socio-economic issue that it is. The Scheduled Tribes constitute
around 9 per cent in Telangana as against 5 per cent in the rest of the State.
Thus, as much as 60 per cent of the ST population of Andhra Pradesh is
concentration in Telangana.
Similarly, the population of Muslims is as high as 12.5 per
cent in Telangana when compared to 6.9 per cent in the rest of the State. As
many as 61 per cent Muslims of Andhra Pradesh live in Telangana of whom 60 per
cent are spread over in different districts other than Hyderabad. Socially and
economically disadvantaged sections including SCs, STs and BCs constitute not
less than 86 per cent of the population in Telangana. They would all be better
able to articulate their problems and politically assert themselves. A separate
Telangana can thus strengthen the forces of social inclusion.
The Eleventh Plan document, lately approved by the National
Development Council gives telling figures, wherein the recently-formed small
states fared better than the parent states in regard to Gross Domestic Product
targets set for the tenth plan period. A comparison of the targeted growth and
that achieved in three such states shows: Chhattisgarh (targeted growth 6.1 per
cent, achieved 9.2 per cent), Jharkhand (targeted 6.9 per cent, achieved 11.1
per cent) and Uttarrakhand (targeted 6.8 per cent, achieved 8.8 per cent). In
contrast, the performance of their parent states, viz. Madhya Pradesh (
targeted 7.0 per cent, achieved 4.3 per cent), Bihar
( targeted 6.2 per cent, achieved 4.7 per cent) and Uttar Pradesh (7.6 per
cent, achieved 4.6 per cent) was distinctly lower, falling considerably short
of the targets.
This experience suggests that the growth potential of these
backward areas remained suppressed for long before their constitutions into new
States. Better governance may have also contributed to attracting outside
investment as well as to better planning and utilization of resources.
Governance at the grass roots can be improved by
strengthening the Panchayati Raj Institutions, which have been deprived of
their functions, finances and functionaries. It is, indeed, ironical that the
Congress, which owed allegiance to Rajiv Gandhi, who visualized the 73rd
and 74th Amendments to the Constitution, had not taken any
initiative to revitalize these institutions.
On the contrary, attempts have been made to undermine these
institutions by floating several top-down schemes and parallel implementation
structures, even naming some schemes after Rajiv. Well, in a separate Telangana
state, the empowerment of these local elected institutions would be high on the
agenda because of greater pressures elected representatives can bring to bear
on the new establishment. ---.INFA
(Copyright,
India News and Feature Alliance)
|