Open Forum
New Delhi, 21 January 2009
Lesson From Malegaon
PARTIES MUST TURN
MIRROR INWARDS
By T.D. Jagadesan
The Malegaon
blast case is hotting up with the Maharashtra Police Anti-terrorism Squad
filing the chargesheet. Other than the case, all eyes would be on what the BJP does
and says. Will it continue to fumble and adopt double standards or will it
acknowledge the an extremist side of Hindutva?
Recall when Ravi Shankar Prasad, the BJP’s amiable
spokesperson, seemed strangely out of form at a press conference after the
arrests were made. It was unusual, so also the subject under discussion --- Hindutva’s
terror connection. A veteran of countless television study debates, Prasad stumbled
and stuttered unable to face the volley of questions on the revelations linking
a handful of Hindutuva, followers to terror attacks in Malegaon and other places.
Asked the hacks: what happened to the BJP’s stand that
terrorism brooked no leniency? The BJP had no qualms about labeling every
Muslim terror suspect as a terrorist; it campaigned for the return of the
draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act, which placed the burden of proof on the
accused. Yet it now wanted the presumption of innocence applied to terror
suspects from its own fold. Why? The party wanted the maximum freedom granted
to terror investigators so that they felt no pressure. Yet it now complained of
police excess. Why?
That was then, in the early days of some Hindutva warrior’s
newly-discovered terror links. As the Maharashtra ATS set off on the saffron
terror trail and arrested a gaggle of activists, among them Sadhvi Pragya Singh
and a serving army officer, the BJP seemed in shock. At a loss for a strategy
to deal with this unexpected twist in the terror plot, the party lurched from
one unclear position to another --- from the tried and tested “let the law take
its course” through outrightly denying the terror link to urging a fair trial
for the accused. Party strategists worried that they had lost the terrorism
plank, and wondered how the new revelations would play out in the electoral
arena.
Judging by the BJP-RSS’ current aggression, the moment of
self-doubt has passed. Evidently the Hindutva terror angle, which formerly
discomfited the parivar, has since become an opportunity to deepen the communal
divide. BJP Chief Rajnath Singh, who has been photographed with Pragya Singh,
earlier claimed that he was embarrassed to have been found in the same frame. Today, he is out on a link to defend her,
going so far as to call the arrest a “huge conspiracy”, and offering full
protection of his party.
The RSS’ initial restraint has similarly given way to
belligerence calculated to incite divisive passions. The crackdown on Pragya
Singh and others had sent the VHP’s Praveen Togadia into a torrent of abuse and
anger. Warning of reprisals against the ATS and the UPA government, he had fumed:
“they are committing the sin of describing a Sadhvi as a terrorist. I promise a
political backlash against this.”
The BJP’s others point, that arrests should be based on hard
evidence, is unexceptional, though this is an unprecedented first from a party,
which has never before attached any importance to evidence. “The Congress must
realize that terrorist investigations can be solved not through propaganda but
only through hard evidence and non-politicized investigation.”
A word of caution is necessary for the BJP’s opponents too.
This is not a moment for gloating or finding satisfaction over the involvement
of Hindutva elements in terrorism. Terrorism is serious, whether of the
Islamist or Hindutva variety, which is all the more reason to ensure that it
does not become a tool for settling political scores or to target the innocent.
It can be no rationale person’s case that investigation into Islamist terrorism
must be meticulous, impartial and transparent but that a wild goose chase is
permissible when the suspects are of Hindutva persuasion.
The BJP is fully within its rights to question the ATS on
the veracity of its findings. Yet this right by no means extends to threatening
the ATS or warning of a backlash. There is also the party’s blatant double
standard. When the Delhi police killed two Muslim terror suspects in an
encounter at Batla House, and made arrests from the neighbourhood, the BJP did
not wait a second to call all of them terrorists and angrily swung at human
rights activists who picked holes in the police version.
The party called Mushirul Hassan, Jamia Millia University
V-C, anti-national for his offer to provide legal assistance to the terror
suspects. It stuck to this, despite a clarification from him that the funds
were being privately arranged by students and teachers. Today, the BJP has
promised to arrange the best legal help for Pragya Singh and others.
If this is an irony, so is the fact that every
terrorism-related charge the party hurled at its political opponents is now
recoiling on it. Terrorism had been the BJP’s biggest plank, topping the agenda
at every party meet and providing the basis for its political resolutions. The
party contended that it alone had the will and inner strength to counter
terrorism, which posed the single-most potent threat to the country’s unity and
integrity.
From this vantage nationalist position, the BJP attacked its
opponents. The Congress and its allies were soft on terror because they coveted
the Muslim vote bank. Human rights activists and even some within the UPA were
openly sympathetic to Muslim terror suspects, offering them legal help,
countering the police claims and so on because they looked at terrorism from an
anti-national perspective.
Amidst all this, the BJP’s prime ministerial candidate, L K
Advani was heard summing up his party’s position on terrorism thus: “let me
make it absolutely clear that we shall never conduct ourselves in such a
short-sighted way that history would hold us guilty of not doing our duty at
the right time and in the right manner --- our vision is not limited by the
considerations of where our party will be after the next elections. Rather, it
extends to caring about where India will be after a hundred years, after a
thousand years.”
Has the BJP passed the test of the “right time” and “right
manner” set by its shadow Prime Minister? Clearly not. The “right manner” at
this “right time” would have been for it to openly acknowledge the possibility
of some extremist Hindutva elements being involved in terrorism while stressing
the importance of transparency in all investigations.
Such a stand would not have tainted the Hindu community. Far
from it, it would have strengthened Hindu society and underscored its
celebrated openness. Instead, the BJP and the Sangh have clung to a single
defence: That as nationalist forces they were above board, indeed that Hindus
could never be terrorists, much less Hindus who subscribed to cultural
nationalism.
This is an absurd claim. Gandhi’s assassin, Nathuram Godse,
was a product of cultural nationalism. The LTTE and the National Democratic
Front of Bodoland (suspected to be involved in the serial Assam blasts), are
not religious extremists but would loosely fill in the Hindu category.
For long the BJP and the Sangh have lamented the absence of
moderate, outspoken voices among Muslims, voices that would frontally confront
the reality of terrorism. It is true that Muslim have largely been in denial
about Islamist terrorism. But that situation is slowly but surely changing. The
evidence is in the unequivocal condemnation of terrorism by over 6000 clerics
at a meeting of Muslim clergy in Hyderabad last November. The BJP must follow
this bold lead rather than bury its head in the sand and believe in the
pristine purity of Hindutuva.
There is much more that is wrong with our approach to
terrorism. Investigative agencies have tended to talk loose and fast, leading
to too many quick-fix arrests. Last week, the Andhra government announced
compensation to at least 15 innocent Muslims who were wrongly arrested by the
Hyderabad police and tortured in custody. Cops on the Hindutva terror trail
have made many contradictory claims. Television channels that ran defamatory
stories about “Muslim terrorists” are now flooding the screens with salacious
details of the “sadhvi and the sant.”
For the challenge of terrorism to be squarely met we need
investigators who brag less and concentrate more on finding clinching evidence.
We need a more responsible media, and finally we need political parties that preach
less and have the courage to turn the mirror inward. –INFA
(Copyright, India News and Feature
Alliance)
|