Home arrow Archives arrow Open Forum arrow Open Forum 2009 arrow Tackling Terror Attacks:TIME TO SHUN PARTISAN POLITICS, by Proloy Bagchi,9 January 2009
News and Features
INFA Digest
Parliament Spotlight
Journalism Awards
Tackling Terror Attacks:TIME TO SHUN PARTISAN POLITICS, by Proloy Bagchi,9 January 2009 Print E-mail

Open Forum

New Delhi, 9 January 2009

Tackling Terror Attacks


By Proloy Bagchi

(Former Civil Servant)

Ever since Liela Khaled of Popular Front for Liberation of Palestine hijacked a TWA flight in 1969, many planes have been hijacked around the world. India, too, has had its share. But the one which is never allowed to remain buried in the sands of history is the hijack on Christmas Eve, 1999 of IC 814, the Indian Airlines flight from Kathmandu to Delhi. What distinguished this hijack from the others is that at the end of the tortuous hard bargaining, the then External Affairs Minister, Jaswant Singh, travelled to Kandahar Airport with the three terrorists, the Government agreed to release in exchange for the freedom of the passengers held hostages.

With 177 passengers and 11 crew members the hijackers forced the pilot to fly to Kandahar via Amritsar, Lahore and Dubai. The passengers, one of whom was killed on the way and his body unceremoniously dropped off the aircraft at Dubai, became objects for a trade-off against 36 terrorists held in Indian prisons. Unless that was done, the hijackers threatened, they would blow up the plane. The lengthy negotiations that ensued eventually ended with the Government agreeing to release only three, though dreaded terrorists, viz. Mushtaq Ahmed Zergar, Ahmed Omer Sheikh and Maulana Masood Azhar. While Masood Azhar was later the mastermind of the attack on Parliament in 2001, Ahmed Omer Sheikh was widely perceived to be responsible for the kidnapping and murder of Daniel Pearle, Mumbai correspondent of the Wall Street Journal.

This hijack has been flogged ad nauseam by the Congress Party to run down and denigrate its opponent, the Bharatiya Janata Party. In the dog-eat-dog world of Indian politics, politicians cannot let go of an opportunity to snap at each other. In the last session of Parliament, no sooner had the leader of the Opposition accused the Congress-led United Progressive Alliance Government of being soft on terror, Congressman Kapil Sibal harked back to the 99 hijack. In a classic instance of one-upmanship, he wanted that the Opposition, the National Democratic Alliance (NDA), should apologise to the people for not only freeing three terrorists, some of whom later perpetrated even more vicious acts of terror, but also had them shamefully “escorted” personally by the country’s External Affairs Minister. As is their wont, regardless of their assurances to the contrary given earlier, politicians started growling at each other.

Later, claiming firmness in handling of the Mumbai terrorists, Digvijay Singh, another Congress biggy, a general secretary to boot, asserted that his party-led Government refused to negotiate with the Mumbai attackers. He went on to claim that yielding no quarter to the attackers, the Government had them eliminated. The innuendo was clearly directed at the NDA. However, the question of any negotiations with the attackers never arose because they had never made any demand. During his interrogation the captured terrorist, Ajmal Amir Qasab, has also asserted that the mandate given to him and others did not include putting forth any demand.

In the highly competitive politics, truth is often the casualty and bluff and bluster occupy centre stage. That the then fledgling NDA Government was faced with an extraordinary situation was never so much as mentioned. The unseemly demonstrations by the relatives of the passengers, covertly stoked by some of those in the Opposition, sustained right through the better part of the week asking for total surrender, including ceding of Kashmir (to Pakistan), and the inexperience of the Government, which had just assumed power, have never been referred to. Curiously, even Jaswant Singh’s unpleasant trip, undertaken only because of his keenness to ensure safe release of the hostages, was also given a malicious twist.

Moreover, the fact that terrorists had been released in exchange for hostages earlier is conveniently forgotten. In the early 90s, five terrorists were released from Kashmir jails to free the abducted Rubaiya Saeed, daughter of the then Home Minster, Mufti Mohammed Saeed. Sibal (or others of his ilk) have never made a mention of it as his party until recently not only ran a coalition government with the Mufti’s party in J&K, but the latter was also one of its allies in the UPA. Sadly, this is precisely what politics is all about – to obfuscate, dissemble and misrepresent to keep the opposition down.

In their petty squabbles, politicians tend to forget that the misfortune that befell the NDA Government can chance upon any regime. Given our lackadaisical way of functioning, a bomb blast, a terror attack, a high profile abduction or a hijack are eminently possible. A number of terrorists, including the one captured alive on 26/11 and another in the death row, continue to languish in Indian prisons. An attempt to free them is very much on the cards. Recall, there were several attempts to get Masood Azhar out of the Jammu prison. Their failure led to the IC 814 hijack as we never woke up to the threat his incarceration posed.

Clearly, the Jihadis and their promoters in the Pakistani establishment do not distinguish between this or that regime. They seem to have an unqualified antipathy for India, an entity that they keenly desire to Islamise. India’s multi-culturalism, its pluralist society and its economic progress despite all its handicaps is what bugs them. What is more, they simply hate India and could even launch attacks out of sheer hatred for it. Already a formation for promoting hatred for India has become operational in Pakistan.

If our politicians are really interested in doing good for the people-- which they keep claiming they do-- they need to shun their narrow partisan agendas and cooperate with each other in devising ways and means to achieve what they claim. The need of the hour is ensuring security of life and property of the people. And, this is precisely what politicians of all shades have neglected while they bickered all the time. To make itself secure, the country needs to pull itself by its boot-straps. From plugging the porous land and sea frontiers to creation of a well-oiled internal security apparatus with all its concomitant paraphernalia – there is enormous amount of work lying ahead before the country’s political bosses.

With neighbours on its two flanks harbouring hostile elements, the country cannot visualise a future without terror and/or devious attempts to bleed it and retard its progress. Unflinching vigilance is necessary – a price that has to be paid to ensure to the citizens freedom from fear and anxiety. It is, therefore, time politicians stopped playing politics with national security. People want no less, for the 26/11 security disaster has made them angry – yes, at none other than the politicians. -- INFA

(Copyright, India News and Feature Alliance)

< Previous
  Mambo powered by Best-IT