POLITICAL DIARY
New Delhi, 20 December 2008
Tu-Tu-Mein-Mein On
Terrorism
OUR NETAS LOSE FOCUS AGAIN
By Poonam I Kaushish
Returning
from Thailand, where a 46-year old Oxford-educated Prime Minister Abhisit Vejjajiva promises a ‘new deal’ and the tourism
industry tries to pick up the pieces after the recent ‘siege’ of Bangkok’s
airport, one finds nothing has changed in political Delhi. In fact, it’s gotten
worse. It’s the same ghisa-pita nautanki
of petty politics, accusations and counter-accusations with the polity merrily trying
to score brownie points on ‘our’ track record on terrorism and ‘your’ track
record. Never mind the heavy cost to the nation, still coming to grips with the
Mumbai terror aftermath.
Tragically,
with elections just months away, both the main players, Congress and the BJP
have made terrorism their favourite milking cow. Especially in the Lok Sabha. Where
both indulged in who had enacted a better anti-terror law, the NDA’s Prevention
of Terrorist Activities Act (POTA) versus the UPA’s Unlawful (Prevention)
Amendment Act (UAPA).
Even
as the Opposition supported the UAPA, the BJP’s Prime Minister-in waiting Advani
could not resist accusing the Congress-led UPA Government of repealing its tough
POTA, “not conceding that it had made a
mistake in doing so” and “its delayed reaction” in enacting the UAPA.
The
Congress’s lawyer-turned Minister Sibal sagiously countered that “it had learnt
from past experience” and had created a more stringent law without giving up on
“basic human rights.” Accusing the BJP of using POTA as “a tool to take your
politics forward ….you talk of nationalism but you indulge in crass politics.
Was your POTA able to prevent the Kandahar
fiasco and other terrorist acts?” he punched. Ending with a grand flourish, “If
anybody has faced terror it is the Congress.”
Countered
Advani, “You say POTA was misused. Is there any law that which cannot be
misused? You cannot oppose a law because of this fear.” Notwithstanding his
colleague former External Affairs Minister Jaswant Singh, who reiterated that
he would again repeat a Kandahar
fiasco.
Shockingly,
when it make to the crux our Right Honorables had neither the inclination nor
the time to debate the final Bill. The anti-terror Act was hurriedly passed
without any thorough study by our MPs. Not only that. They overturned
conventional wisdom and time-honoured practices of referring the Bill to a
Standing Committee of the House for in-depth consideration.
Worse
followed. Instead of collectively applying balm on the ravaged nation’s psyche
following the Mumbai carnage trust our polity to use Union Minority Affairs
Minister A.R. Antulay’s intemperate bombshell on the Maharashtra anti-terrorist
squad chief Hemant Karkare and his two top officials killing to raise their
respective caste and religious electoral bars for the forthcoming general
elections.
Asserted
Antulay, “There is more than what meet the eyes…Karkare was investigating some
cases in which non-Muslims were involved.” He then went on to explain why he is
not in agreement with the view that Karkare was killed by terrorists.
“Superficially speaking, they (terrorists) had no reason to kill Karkare.
Whether he (Karkare) was victim of terrorism or terrorism plus something? I do
not know. Somebody who knew both the ends sent him in the wrong direction,
otherwise why should he have gone to Cama hospital. He should have gone to Taj,
Oberoi or Nariman House.”
“He
(Karkare) went to Cama hospital on the basis of a phone call. Who is that
person who made the phone call? This should be probed…somebody wanted him to be
killed. Why all the three ATS officers went together is beyond my
comprehension…”, he added. Bluntly, what
Antulay was suggesting was that Karkare’s death was the handiwork of Hindu
outfits, angry with his Malegaon
investigations. He reminded Advani that he had called for a change in the
investigating team.
Predictably
all hell broke lose. The Opposition used Antulay to beat the Government for not
being serious about punishing the perpetrators of the Mumbai attacks, playing
into Pakistan’s
hand and demanded Antulay’s sacking from the Union Government. The Prime
Minister should explain whether it is the opinion of one minister or collective
wisdom of his Cabinet,” said the BJP.
A
shell-shocked ruling Congress went into damage control and distanced itself
from Antulay, by stating that those were his personal views. In fact, it tried
turning the tables on the BJP by getting its MPs to aver that the Saffron
Sangh was blowing the issue out of
proportion to deflect attention from the manner in which it had lashed out at
the ATS chief when he was alive.
Clearly
the Congress is caught between a rock and a hard place. Either which way, keeping
Antulay would anger its Hindu constituents and replacing him would further
alienate the minority community. Even as Antulay continues to stick to his guns
amid growing support from across the political spectrum, be it allies or foes
and has become the Muslims latest poster boy with Muslim clerics, minority
fundamental organizations, and intellectuals applauding him for “speaking the
unspeakable.”
Many
minority MPs batted for Antulay. “Karkare died under mysterious circumstances.
He and his two officers were killed just when the ATS was making sensational
disclosures regarding the alleged involvement of Hindu extremist outfits in the
Malegaon blast
case,” was their common refrain.
Forgotten
in the Antulay furore is how New Delhi should
now ensure that Mumbai is never repeated, carry forward its diplomatic pressure
on Islamabad, mobilize international opinion
against Pakistan’s
terrorists’ breeding grounds and tackling the worsening economic situation and growing
unemployment thanks to the global meltdown.
The
big issue, as being made out is not the Minister’s statement, resignation or
sack from the Government. But it encompasses the larger question of unitedly
fighting terror, instead of the perennial tu-tu-mein-mein.
The fact is that Karkare and hundreds of nameless citizens died in the
Mumbai mayhem. Time for our netagan to
rise above politricking and get their act together in meeting the terror
challenge.
In
the ultimate, our polity should have a single united approach to fight the scourge
of terror. Regrettably, our polity has its eyes only on keeping their seats
warm in Parliament. With the elections round the corner it is indeed unfortunate
that our political parties continue to grab trivial issues and blow them out of
proportion to suit their respective casteist and religious moulds to woo their
electorate. Failing to realize that they are further tearing the fragile fabric
of secularism.
It
needs to be remembered that as no quarter should be given to Hindu
fundamentalism the same holds true of Muslim fanatics. Terror has no caste,
colour or creed. The Mumbai attacks have once again spotlighted
Pakistan-sponsored terrorism playing merry hell with India. Shouldn’t our polity train
its guns against this rogue State and keep the heat on rather than side-tracking
the issue in mindless mind games and nonsense. ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|