|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Diary
A NEW WAY TO COMBAT CORRUPTION, By Inder Jit, 25 April 2024 |
|
|
REWIND
New Delhi, 25 April
2024
A NEW WAY TO COMBAT
CORRUPTION
By Inder Jit
(Released on 10
October 1989)
Corruption continues to grow --- and the corrupt continue to
flourish and prosper. Each succeeding day spotlights some new scandal. Corruption
is thus poised to become one of the major issues in the forthcoming poll
battle, if not the principal issue. Not a few people in New Delhi disagree.
They argue: “Most of our voters in the villages have not heard of Bofors,
contrary to claims. In any case, few see anything wrong in the present day
Rajas making money. Who else would? But those who have their ears to the ground
are equally clear. The common man, they assert, is greatly agitated over mounting
corruption, which has seeped down to the grassroots and is now pushing up
prices. In fact, this point was boldly made at a recent meeting of the
Congress-I Working Committee by a top State leader whose warning in regard to
the 1977 poll proved prophetic. He told Mr. Rajiv Gandhi: “Bhrashtachar will be the main issue. We must have our answers.”
This raises a question which all of us and, more especially, those
who swore loudly by Mahatma Gandhi last week need to ask: How would Bapu have
reacted to the present state of corruption in the country and, equally
importantly, to the present five-star life style and culture of the ruling
classes? How would the Mahatma have tackled the problem of corruption? Alas,
the thought does not seem to have occurred at all to those who made it a point
to be seen at Raj Ghat (courtesy Doordarshan) or to speak at one meeting or
another in Gandhian accents and idiom. Equally distressingly, few have come to
give attention to another cancerous growth in India’s body politic: increasing
criminalisation of public life. This raises one other question. What would Bapu
have done to stop known criminals and convicts from taking India towards
Pindari raj and destroying everything that the Father of the Nation and his
chosen instrument, Nehru, espoused and stood for?
The Mahatma was fully conscious of the pitfalls ahead. Indeed, he
not only advocated simple living for the Ministers and a salary of Rs 500/-
p.m. but virtually outlined a code of conduct for them in his writings from
1937 to 1948. He wanted the Ministers to be watchful both of their personal and
public conduct and said that “they have to be, like Ceaser’s wife, above
suspicion in everything.” Offices must be held in the Government “with the
spirit of service” without the slightest expectation of private gain for
themselves or for their relations or friends. “There is beauty and an art in
simplicity,” he said and added: “It does not require money to be neat, clean
and dignified. Pomp and pageantry are often synonymous with vulgarity.” He
wanted Ministership to be viewed as a crown of thorns, not one of jewels.
Tragically, the Mahatma was snatched away before he could get free India’s new
rulers to accept and practise his ideas.
Nehru and Lal Bahadur Shastri favoured a comprehensive code of democratic
functioning and set up the Santhanam Committee on Prevention of Corruption,
which submitted its report on March 31, 1964. In pursuance of this report, the
Shastri Government announced in October 1964 a code for Central and State
Ministers. This provided, inter alia, for furnishing to the Prime
Minister/Chief Minister at the initial appointment and subsequently every year
by a minister a declaration showing the details of the assets and liabilities
and business interests of the minister and dependent relations of his family
(wife or husband, minor children and dependent relations.) The details to be
disclosed were to consist of particulars of all immovable property and the
total approximate value of (a) shares and debentures (b) cash holding and (c)
jewellery. But this has been implemented more in its breach. Few Ministers have
cared to file any such return over the past decade.
The situation could have been transformed dramatically if Mr Rajiv
Gandhi had accepted a suggestion made to him early in 1985 requiring himself and
his Ministerial colleagues at the Centre and the Chief Minister and his team in
the States as also all MPs and MLAs to declare their movable and immovable
assets to Parliament and the State Assemblies respectively at the outset and
annually thereafter. Benami assets
were almost certain to be a problem. But this could be largely tackled by
requiring the Ministers also to declare the assets of their sons, daughters,
sons-in-law and other members of the family. True, Ministers at the Centre and
in various States are already required to furnish a list of their assets to the
Prime Minister or the Chief Minister respectively in accordance with the
aforementioned code. But this has at best served the personal interest of the
leader by enhancing his capacity to control and manipulate his colleagues and
not the interest of the party or the nation.
Japan has succeeded where we in India have failed. It has
eloquently and admirably shown the way of firmly tackling the ogre of public
corruption. Two Prime Ministers have already had to quit -- Mr Tanaka in the
shocking Lockheed affair and Mr Takeshita in the Recruit scandal. All this has
been made possible by a firm commitment to certain minimum norms of public
morality. At the same time, meaningful steps have been taken to ensure clean
public life. Not many in India are aware that Japan gave itself in 1984 a new
practice whereunder Cabinet and other Ministers in the Government are required
to make public their assets in the form of land, houses, deposits, stocks and so
on shortly after they take office. Since June this year, the Ministers are also
required to declare the assets owned by their family members. Further, they are
now required to disclose the amount of cash and other tangible assets held by
them when they leave office!
Importantly, the declaration of assets by the Ministers in Japan is
given wide publicity through a Government report. Some of the information made
available by Kyodo news agency last week deserves to be shared with the reader.
The Prime Minister, Mr Kaifu, and his wife hold assets worth 107 million yen
(Rs 1.78 crores), placing him eighth among 21 Cabinet Ministers. (Mr Kaifu's
house in Tokyo is now worth approximately 730 million yen, according to real
estate sources. The Foreign Minister, Mr Nakayama, is the wealthiest member of
Mr Kaifu's Cabinet. He and his family owned assets of over 666 million yen (Rs
7.16 crores) when he assumed the position on August 10 last. (The value of real
estate and stock shares is calculated on the basis of official real estate
register and face value of shares, which are substantially lower than the
market prices.) The number of Ministers who reported more than 100 million yen
in assets was eight, down from 12 in Uno’s Cabinet.
Can something be done at this stage? The answer is still a loud yes.
Public opinion should require every candidate to declare his assets in a sworn
affidavit and thereby come clean before the voters. Those failing to do so
should be openly spurned and rejected. Some unscrupulous candidates might feel
tempted to mislead. But this problem could be tackled by requiring every
successful candidate to lay his affidavit on the table of the Lok Sabha. Public
opinion could, in addition, require all the political parties to spell out
their commitment to combating corruption. As proof of their bona fides, they
should not only get their candidates to declare their assets but also to
include in their respective poll manifestos a specific commitment to make three
things obligatory for their Ministers: (i) declaration of assets on taking
office; (ii) declaration to include assets owned by family members and (iii)
declaration of cash and other assets at the time of leaving office.
Likewise, there is urgent need to get all the registered political
parties to make certain specific commitments to prevent what is described as “criminalisation
of politics.” All persons guilty of crimes and convicted so must be refused
tickets. Equally, tickets should also be refused to those under a cloud in the
public life for alleged crimes or otherwise. (Experience in Britain shows it is
not always easy to get known criminals or corrupt publicmen convicted.)
Provision should also be made for a candidate to secure more than half the
votes polled to get elected. There should be provision too for a negative vote
entitling a voter to cast his ballot against all the candidates listed. All in
all, steps need to be taken in the next few weeks to combat both corruption and
criminalisation of politics. Time is running out. Double talk and deception
have been allowed to go on for too long. INFA
(Copyright, India
News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
BJP’s Corruption Mantra: WILL IT WIN POPULAR SUPPORT?, By Dhurjati Mukherjee, 24 April 2024 |
|
|
Open
Forum
New
Delhi, 24 April 2024
BJP’s Corruption Mantra
WILL IT WIN POPULAR SUPPORT?
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
The
first phase of polling over,it’s getting increasingly interesting to watch how
far BJP and its star campaigner Prime Minister Modi will go to press the corruption
button against the opposition, particularly the Congress. His crusade against
corruption which he’s been emphasising at various election meetings across the country
has apparently evoked cheers among the crowds,though targeting the Opposition
leaders only would be viewed as ‘political vendetta’ sharpened this election
season.
Importantly,
a recent interview with Asianet Newswas well utilised by Modi to flog
the issue and give it some credence by focussing on the performance of the
Enforcement Directorate (ED) before and after 2014, since NDA came to power. He
said: “Until 2014, under PMLA, only 1,800 cases were registered. In the last 10
years, 4,700 cases have been registered." And while assets worth
only ₹5,000 crore were attached until 2014, this figure has surged to
over ₹1 lakh crore in the past decade.
Moreover,
the Prime Minister stated that before 2014, ED had seized only ₹34 lakh in
cash, while under our government it has seized more than ₹2,200 crore in
cash. “Imagine, if this money was invested in welfare schemes for the poor, how
many people would have benefited, how many opportunities could have been
created for the youth”.
Modi acknowledged
that such "exemplary work" is bound to cause problems for some
individuals and entities. Taking a swipe at opposition parties critical of the
ED's actions, he remarked, "And for the same reason, they are engaged in
abusing Modi day and night. He further accused the opposition of "weaving
dreams by calculating on paper," while asserting that his government has
transcended mere dreams and delivered on guarantees.
It may
be interesting to note according to Modi only 3 per cent of the cases being
probed by the ED are of politicians though, however, around 90 per cent of
these are politicians from the Opposition parties. In response the INDIA bloc
points out to BJP’s scam of electoral bonds as well as the disproportionate
action against the opposition leaders in contrast to those who switched sides,
joined the BJP, or allied with it. It has for example hit out at the closure of
the corruption case against NCP leader, Praful Patel after he along with
some others joined the BJP-led alliance.
However,
an important question arises what will be done with the money seized by the ED?
Will it be used for the welfare of the poor or in building infrastructure that
is used mainly by the rich and the upper middle-income sections? As Modi himself
maintained, if the money seized is invested in welfare schemes, monitored
strictly at the grass-root level, there would be considerable improvement in
the lives of the poor and the underprivileged.
While
analysts are busy assessing how much the corruption issue will impact the
possibility of Modi returning to power for the third term, some other
developments need to be analysed. Firstly, whether BJP’s ‘Sankalp Patra’, which
builds on Modi’s vision of India becoming a developed country by 2047 through
acceleration of infrastructure creation in diverse ways such as expansion of
bullet train network, launch of ‘new age’ trains and modern airports,
construction of more expressways apart from developing the country into a
global manufacturing powerhouse, would impress the masses.
Though
all these are mostly related to business activities, thereare points that have
been aimed at the poor: (i) free ration to be continued for five years, (ii)
free drinking water in all villages, towns and cities and (iii) free
electricity to poor households under PM Surya Ghar Muft Bijli Yojana. But
these get diminished in comparison to the charge of corruption levelled against
the rivals. Even the resolve of creating more IITs, IIMs AIIMS and making available
affordable houses for the middle-class by lowering construction and
registration costs and strengthening RERA does not really touch the lower
echelons of society.
Considering
the need to focus on the poor and marginalised sections and create jobs and
opportunities, the political parties need to talk about changing strategy if brought
to power where national income and wealth should not be concentrated by 5 or 10
per cent of the population. Besides, what about imposing a one per cent wealth
tax to fund education and health in backward regions where lower castes and the
extremely poor struggle for existence, as suggested by several experts and also
by Oxfam.
The
issues no doubt will attract a sizeable section of voters, though as days pass
analysts are of the opinion that Modi’s run will not be as easy as it was
thought at the initial stages. As has been advocated by most political
analysts, the pro-business attitude of Modi and his party has been well
manifest with the opposition criticising him for the government’s failure to
deliver on its past promises. Congress is flogging the point: “What
happened to the promise of two crore jobs annually, doubling farmers’ income,
giving MSP as per the formula of the Swaminathan commission, depositing Rs 15
lakh in every account”.
However,
it remains to be said that infrastructure development which has been moving at
a fast pace under the present dispensation is no doubt noteworthy. Moreover,
indigenisation has led to spurt in business of organisations like Hindustan
Aeronautics ltd. {HAL}, Garden Reach Shipbuilders & Engineers Ltd. (GRSE),
RVNL, IRCON etc. and it is expected that in the third term, the pace would
continue unhindered.
At the
same time, what needs attention is more funds for welfare and a rural focus to
the new government’s plans and programmes. Education and health have to be
taken up by the government in the right spirit with adequate funds so that the
backward districts are not devoid of functional health centres, higher
secondary schools and colleges. This must be the primary focus of the next Modi
government, if it comes back to power.
It is
here that Modi’s chief adversary, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, through his
yatras across the country has highlighted --the problems of the common man in
the light of rising prices and costs of living. The situation is obviously more
pathetic in rural areas. Rahul’s simple style of message may have an impact to
a select section, specially the educated ones, but Modi’s over-powering
rhetoric and mannerisms with the strong cadre base of the BJP clearly putsBJP in
an advantageous position.
Finally,
the present policy of authoritarianism, spread of hate and bigotry and lack of
civility, compassion and fellow feeling among individuals due to perversion and
jealousy in society has to change. BJP has been critical of parivarvadbut
authoritarianism, as being increasingly feared,is not healthy for a vibrant
society. There’s need for correction, particularly in public life as country’s social
fabric and relationships between individuals and communities are unfortunately
steadily eroding.----INFA
(Copyright, India news & Feature Alliance
|
|
Love Jihad: HOLIER THAN THOU POLL WAR By Poonam I Kaushish, 23 April 2024 |
|
|
Political Diary
New Delhi,
23 April 2024
Love Jihad
HOLIER THAN THOU POLL
WAR
By Poonam I Kaushish
In this heated poll
season, India is once again caught in a battle royale between the Gods, another Love Jihad (LJ) which is raising temperatures. LJ, a convenient
political tool and de rigueur wrapped
in welfare schemes and development that helped bring BJP to power at the Centre
twice over. Whereby, ishq-mohabat-shaadi
cutting across caste and religious boundaries inter-meshed with forced
conversions churned the political cauldron resulting in an unholy clash between
the ‘holier than thou’!
The latest Love Jihad outcry has its genesis in murder of a Karnataka
college girl by her former classmate in Hubballi which has ignited a political
firestorm in the State, with the girl’s family alleging the accused had been pressuring her to religiously convert and marry him.
Naturally, the BJP termed it a case of ‘love jihad,’ hitting out at the
Siddaramaiah-led Government, accusing it of playing politics of appeasement at
the expense of law and order. With the ruling Congress staunchly denying the
allegation, asserting “it was a mutual relationship.” Thereby, reopening the can of worms of the old familiar enemy, country
wide.
Resulting in the Hindutva brigade bandying Bahu-Beti
Bachao Sangharsh Samitis and unleashing an aggressive, systematic campaign
to create “awareness” and combat LJ with the BJP being the driving force behind
anti love-jihadists legislations across States ruled by it. Wherein, any action
taken against the perpetrators is justified, even if it means taking law into
their hands. Said UP Chief Minister Yogi, “those who conceal their identity and
play with the honour of our sisters and daughters, if you don’t mend your ways,
your ‘Ram naam satya’ journey (final
trip) will begin.”
Congress accuses BJP
for engineering Hindu majoritarian communal style of politics by using tactics
like attempting to electorally marginalise Muslims to patronising communal
violence, especially around the emotive ‘love jihad’ issue and bringing
anti-conversion laws in States ruled by it.
The BJP retaliates by
blaming Congress and its State Government of failing to take action against the
Muslim boy slamming it as a ‘Muslim Party’ part of the “tukde-tukde gang” which protects terrorists and follows politics
of appeasement “working on Pakistan’s agenda.”
As for other Opposition
Parties despite taking the Hindutva brigade to task over their anti-minority
plank and opposing aggressive Hindutva consolidation, they do not want to be
labeled as “pro-Muslim.” Reading the ‘Muslim mind’ as an anti-BJP phenomenon on
which they base their political strategy.
Who does one fault?
Given our netas have perfected
intemperate language to inject poison in society over the years. Alas, politics
has meandered into narrow confines of polarisation and appeasement rhetoric,
rabble rousing abusive, devoid of any substance, spreading hatred but also
tilted towards widening the communal divide pitting Hindus against Muslims.
All to sway sentiments
before elections in all religions whereby every Party is stoking the fire,
hoping it would gain dividends underscoring the games politicians play at the
altar of political expediency. To keep their gullible vote-banks emotionally
charged so that their own ulterior motives are well-served.
Undeniably, post its
defeat in the State Assembly polls, BJP is using its new Hindutva rajneeti post Ayodhya consecration and Hindu
cultural renaissance to make inroads into areas and regions even with little or
no significant minority presence as it revolves around its pet slogan Sab Ka Saaath, Sab Ka Vikas, Sab Ka Vishwas
es baar 400 paar. Yet it realizes the ‘Muslim mind’ is still
problematic.
Last year various
right-wing outfits undertook Hindu Jan
Akrosh rallies to press for laws against ‘love jihad,’ ‘land jihad’ and
‘Hindutva is in danger’ card. Opposition Parties accuse the Saffron Sangh of
playing out divisive issues: how Muslim population’s growth rate threatens the
primacy of the “Hindu” nation with a cynical eye on electoral gains.
Notwithstanding, this dog whistle politics spells bad news for communal
harmony.
Not many are aware the LJ programme started in 1996 with
blessings of some Muslim organizations in Kerala, though the term was first
heard in the State’s Pathanamthitta district in September 2009 and used in a
Kerala High Court judgment three months later. Dubbing it ‘an alleged Muslim
plot to forcefully convert young brilliant Hindu girls to Islam by having
Muslim boys entrap them in love affairs’, it asked the State Government to
consider enacting a law to prohibit such “deceptive acts of LoveJihad”.
Notwithstanding denials by Islamic fundamentalist outfits
like National Democratic Front (NDF) and ‘Campus Front’ of Popular Front of
India (PFI), the Kerala Government said that 2,667 women had converted to Islam
in the State since 2006. Police figures on the other hand total over 8000
conversions in the last four years alone. Add to this another 60,000 girls have
been converted in Karnataka alone according to the Hindu Janajagruti
Samiti. In the last six months UP registered over 20 LJ cases.
Turn North, South, East or West, the story is the same.
Religion is turning out to be a question of money, big money. Recall, flush
with funds from their headquarters in the US, a number of church groups
allegedly converted hundreds of Hindus to Christianity in Tamil Nadu, Kerala,
Andhra Pradesh, Kashmir and Karnataka by giving them money and jobs in the
decades post Independence.
On the flip side, the VHP and Bajrang Dal too established
groups of armed youth, called Raksha Sena,
in every village of Chhattisgarh, in order to stop conversions to
Christianity. And where conversions had
taken place another movement called the Ghar
Wapsi (“Return Home”) was launched in Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan,
Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Gujarat and Orissa for reconverting the tribal Christian
back to Hinduism.
To put an end to this five States: Rajasthan, Orissa,
Arunachal Pradesh, Chhattisgarh and Gujarat have enacted anti-conversion laws
that bar conversions but allow re-conversions to Hinduism. Jharkhand has
declared its intention to enact a similar law.
Fortunately, the
Supreme Court settled this matter in 1973 wherein it distinguished between the
right to proselytize and the right to convert. Upholding the Constitutional
validity on anti-conversion laws enacted by Orissa and Madhya Pradesh in
1967-68, it ruled: “What the Constitution grants is not the right to convert
another person to one’s own religion, but to transmit or spread one’s religion
by an exposition of its tenders.” The Court also observed that organized
conversion was anti-secular and that respect for all religions was the essence
of India’s secularism.
It is time now for our
leaders to spare a thought for all those who have lost their lives in the
meaningless Love Jihad over the years
and delink religion and divisive grammar from politics, consider a ban on
divisive politics and open a “mohabbat ki
dukan in a nafrat ka bazaar.”
Importantly, they need
to understand that by playing Hindus and Muslims against each other they are
only serving their vested interests. The aim should be to raise the bar on
public discourse, not lower it any more. Parties and fringe elements need to
realize the collateral damage it causes will be permanent. Neither Lord Ram nor
will Allah forgive the polity for playing havoc in its name.
Let us not reduce LJ to a political gimmick. Our leaders
need to do a cost-benefit analysis and put a stop to
converting religious gush into political slush. True Love Jihad, anyone? ----- INFA
(Copyright India
News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
J&K Economy Paces Up: GSDP DOUBLES, HEALTH SHINES, By Shivaji Sarkar, 22 April 2024 |
|
|
Economic Highlights
New
Delhi, 22 April 2024
J&K Economy Paces Up
GSDP DOUBLES, HEALTH SHINES
By Shivaji Sarkar
Jammu
and Kashmir is advancing at a pace that may surprise many across the nation,
boasting of strong health and social indicators. It stands out with impressive
statistics for women and high per capita income particularly remarkable
considering it’s a region predominantly inhabited by minorities.
The
Union Territory is making strides forward despite occasional Opposition
protests, such as the one in September 2023 against the abrogation of Article
370 and the delay of grassroots elections. The Congress on April 1, 2024, held
protests again at Srinagar BJP state headquarters against the Centre over its
alleged attempts to cripple the Opposition parties ahead of the general
elections. Democratic protests are back.
It was
not easy, but Home Minister Amit Shah, who not only led the scrapping of
Articles 370 and 35A but also keepsa close watch on every development, observed
and analysed with precision, allows such demonstrations to give a vent to the
anguish. This was not possible some years back when none knew from where a
terrorist bullet would fly in. Since June 19, Shah has been visiting the Union
Territory often and these became more frequent since October to reorganise the
affairs.Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha says that the speed of development in
the UT has gone up by ten times since the abrogation of Article 370. However, voices
within disputethis.
Kashmir
is aspirational as it has better standard of living and aspires to have more
investments and strengthen its different indicators. There are impressive data
from the administration and the NITI Aayog which show it is progressing on most
counts as investments pour in. It has received investment proposals totalling
Rs 56,857 crore against a target of Rs 75,000 crore, potentially creating 2.62
lakh jobs. From 1600 investors, 800 have already deposited their initial
investments and secured land allotments. However, the full impact is yet to be
realised due to gestational issues in the process. Additionally, the administration
anticipates an additional Rs 3,000 crore in foreign investment following
business delegation visits from the UAE and other countries. Since
2019, gross state GDP (GSDP) has doubled to Rs 2.25 lakh crore from Rs 1 lakh
crore.
The
Economist magazine writes, “Tourism, it is true,
has seen a modest recovery—backed by a government campaign that portrays
Kashmir as a peaceful, picturesque place. Visitor numbers in 2022 were roughly
the same as in 2018 (more in 2023). Yet tourism, which currently accounts for 6
percent of state’s GDP has taken an almighty leap to be a major driver of
growth”. Though political changes thawed some sectors.
Social
welfare and focus on healthcare and education has been the cornerstone of
governance in J&K since the mid-20th century. This has improved with
government jobs, which are dwindling. There is restlessness as jobs,
particularly government jobs, are lagging. Most of 2.62 lakh jobs promised are
not in government.The state tops in health indicators, according to National
Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5). It has a sex ratio at birth of 976 female
births against per 1000 male children. This means 47 more female births against
all-India average of 929.
Infant
mortality rate, children dying before the age 5, at 18.5 per 1000, is better
than the national average of 42. Even the total fertility rate is
positive. Against national average of 2, J&K has 1.4. It means 60 fewer
births, ensuring better health and living conditions. Most births take place at
a hospital or clinic. Against national average of 88.6 percent, 92.4 percent of
the women deliver their babies in an institutional facility. But 65 percent
women suffer from anaemia against the national average of 57 percent.
As per
NITI Aayog’s 2023 report, the standard of living is higher in terms of use of
clean fuel – 32 percent; electricity usage 99 percent and housing. However, it lags
behind in access to clean drinking water, 10.37 percent against the national
7.3 percent.
Women in
J&K are relatively more empowered than rest of India. It has less spousal
violence; higher age at marriage, female labour force participation, women
attaining more than 10 years of schooling and owning phones. Overall social
conditions are better than the average living conditions of minorities
elsewhere in India. Even it has less polygamy at 1.4 percent.J&K has an average
per capita income of Rs 1.36 lakh and is comparable with Punjab’s Rs 1.49 lakh.
Shah
notes an improvement in the Valley’s situation, projecting J&K as a leading
economic state. Intense combing operations before his visits have now become
routine drills. Terrorism is nearly eradicated in the Valley, although sporadic
incidents of migrant killings occur in the Rajouri-Poonch area. This region,
part of the Anantnag constituency, is divided by the PirPanjal range, forcing
candidates to undertake a 500 km detour to reach voters. Traversing the
constituency poses a significant challenge for political parties and candidates
during campaigning.
The National
Conference of Farooq Abdullah with ally Congress is contesting all the seats as
they could not reach an agreement with PDP leader Mehbooba Mufti. She is
contesting from Anantnag. The NC-Cong is contesting Baramulla, Anantnag,
and Srinagar in the Valley, and Udhampur and Jammu. Since the Valley politics
has become volatile, the BJP is not contesting or even supporting its supposed
allies like the Democratic Progressive Azad Party of Ghulam Nabi Azad and Apni
Party. Azad though was keen but has not filed his nomination. Similarly,
ApniPary is also in the lurch.
Shah and
Prime Minister Narendra Modi decided the party would not contest the seats in
the Valley to involve the local people more in the parliamentary system and
governance. The Centre is sending vibes that Kashmir would do better with the
support of its own people as their trust deepens.
Regional
parties express their discontent, attributing it to a portion of their
supporters who insist on further improvements in the security situation. Despite
this, there remains a persistent demand for the reinstatement of Article 370,
which appears unattainable. Many individuals still express discomfort with the
extensive security presence, now more covert, which is reportedly targeting
migrant populations. Economic growth, reflected in job opportunities and
business development, remains stagnant, affecting the average income per
family. Approximately 22 percent of the population remains unemployed.
Following the Lok Sabha elections, there is optimism among the people for
broader prospects and opportunities.----INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
India Votes: 1st PHASE SEES BOYCOTT, By Insaf, 20 April 2024 |
|
|
Round The States
New Delhi, 20 April 2024
India Votes
1st PHASE SEES BOYCOTT
By Insaf
The biggest democratic exercise in the world kicked off
yesterday. Of the 543 Lok Sabha seats, 102 went to the polls in the first phase
across 21 states and UTs. While the Election Commission was reeling out polling
percentages, as 40% odd around 1 p.m. across the board, it would be upset with
its tally by the end of the day, given chunks of voters chose to boycott
instead. In six districts and 20 Assembly segments of 60 in eastern Nagaland
not a single vote had been cast. This is in response to call by Eastern
Nagaland People’s Organisation (ENPO) asking for a complete shutdown for the
solitary Lok Sabha seat given the Center’s failure to keep its promise of
creating Frontier Nagaland Territory. Apparently, state CEO show-caused the
ENPO asking why action shouldn’t be taken against it for interfering or
attempting to interfere with free exercise of any electoral right and
thereby committing undue influence. Pat came the reply: “shut down was
voluntary initiative by people” and call was given for maintaining law and
order situation! In down south Tamil Nadu, the story is similar. In nine places,
the voters did not go to polling stations either as a protest against a
greenfield airport coming up, or for a railway bridge not being built, or
non-resolution of their long-pending demands for basic facilities. However, no action
can be taken against the voter. The blame lies elsewhere. The voters make their
point, and it must be corrected.
* * * *
Rajputs To Boycott BJP
Should the BJP be worried on western UP front? At a ‘mahapanchayat’,
on Tuesday last, Rajputs decided to boycott the saffron party candidates in Muzaffarnagar,
Kairana and Saharanpur Lok Sabha constituencies. Their grudge is that the
community has been neglected in the distribution of party tickets. And thus, in
these areas, the community will not vote for BJP candidates, ‘but will opt for
another strong candidate from other parties.’ Interestingly, while the boycott
is for BJP candidates, the Rajputs said it wouldn’t apply to Chief Minister
Yogi Adityanath, who ‘was their voice, but wasn’t being heard by central BJP
leadership’! Intriguing indeed for the voter as in UP, it’s not Prime Minister
Modi alone which holds sway, but Yogi too, who has come to be seen as a good
administrator. The region has helped BJP per se win majority of seats in the
past due to a consolidated Hindu vote. But now the big question is whether the ‘mahapanchayat’
decision ‘will become the reason for BJP’s downfall in Western UP,’ as claimed.
* * * *
TN in Focus
Tamil Nadu this time round has surprised many an election
watcher. Campaigning in the state had been hitting national headlines. This,
given the fact that BJP has kept a sharp focus on the south and longs to make
inroads. And that’s why this election is seeing a three-cornered contest: the
ruling DMK-led alliance which includes Congress, two Communist parties and
Muslim League; BJP and opposition AIADMK, which parted company from NDA. While
the DMK and team is confident that it shall rule the roost, the margin
victories may not be as easy as was in 2019 and that it is facing an
inti-incumbency factor. For the BJP, state president K Annamalai has kept the
party’s presence in the state, but it is star campaigner Modi and his
popularity which the party is banking upon, given his repeated campaign visits
in past year, especially the past couple of months. BJP, which has raised the
stakes seeks to change the arithmetic, by relegating AIADMK to the third spot,
managing the second for itself. Recall, the state has in the past voted
one-sided: in 2019 of 39 seats, DMK-Congress got 38 and in 2014, AIADMK got 37.
Will BJP be a new entrant in Dravidian politics?
* * * *
Chhattisgarh ‘Surgical Strike’
Naxalism will see an end in five years in Chhattisgarh if
BJP comes to power, were words of Union Home Minister Amit Shah, seeking votes during
last November’s Assembly polls. He is determined as on Tuesday last, the BJP-ruled
state witnessed the biggest encounter in the state’s history of fighting Left
Wing Extremism, with 29 Maoists killed in Kanker district and 3 security
personnel injured in a joint operation of BSF and state police’s District
Reserve Guard. It’s being said senior cadres of outlawed CPI-Maoist Shankar,
Lalita, Raju and others, may have died in the operation launched and a huge
cache of weapons, including AK-47, SLR, Insas and .303 rifles, were recovered. Since
2024, 79 Maoists have been killed in their stronghold of Bastar region, which
goes to polls yesterday. Polling in Kanker district will be held on April 26. Hailing
it as a ‘surgical strike’, Deputy CM and state home minister Sharma reached out
to the Maoists saying ‘We want talks…whether they do it in a group or through
representatives. Bastar needs peace. We are committed to this.’ Will his offer
be taken up after this encounter?
* * * *
States Laxity On Mob Lynching
State governments must pull up their socks. With most not
filing their affidavits in a writ petition filed in July last regarding action
they have taken in incidents of mob lynching and cow vigilantism against the
Muslim community, the Supreme Court has issued a deadline of six weeks and
shall take up the case after summer break. The petition was filed by National
Federation of Indian Women seeking directions to States to take immediate steps
viz the top court’s verdict of 2018 to effectively deal with such cases.
Notices were issued to the Centre and DGPs of Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Orissa, Bihar,
Madhya Pradesh, and Haryana. While the latter two states filed their reply, the
petitioner pointed out that in MP there was an incident of alleged mob-lynching,
but the FIR was for cow slaughter against victims and likewise in Haryana FIR
was registered for transporting beef but not mob lynching. All incidents, not
selective, must be reported as states have principal obligation to ensure vigilantism,
be it cow vigilantism or any other vigilantism of any perception, doesn’t take
place, had said the court. It issued guidelines for authorities to deal with
such incidents, but so far it’s been in vain!
* * * *
Relief For Dog Lovers
Dog lovers will be relieved but must be watchful. The
Centre’s notification banning sale and breeding of 23 breeds of ferocious dogs,
including American Bulldog and Pit-bull Terriers has been a no-go in two
courts. Karnataka High Court quashed it with no such power available under
Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 or Animal Birth Control Rules, New
Delhi had no such authority. A week later, petitions challenging the directive
in Delhi High Court were disposed, after Department of Animal Husbandry and
Dairying admitted it was put out without consulting or inviting objections and
suggestions from private entity or stakeholders. Agreeing it wasn’t possible to
give an oral hearing to every dog owner, the Centre was directed to issue “a
public notice on its official website and one national daily inviting
objections to the proposed draft notification/amendment to the rules.” These,
it said, shall be considered before finalising fresh notification. The Dept
must listen lest it finds itself in the doghouse! ---INFA
(Copyright, India News Feature
Alliance)
|
|
| | << Start < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| Results 10 - 18 of 5990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|