|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic Highlights
Towards Destruction of Parliament, By Inder Jit, 19 December 2023 |
|
|
REWIND
New Delhi, 19 December 2023
Towards Destruction of Parliament
By Inder Jit
(Released on 25 August 1987)
Parliament today faces its biggest ever
challenge and crisis. Some of us have deplored its decline over the years. Loud
protests have been voiced over repeated assaults on the two Houses and the
system itself. But last week saw Parliament under brazen attack. In fact, what
came pass has made all those who stand for Parliamentary democracy gravely
anxious about its future. On Saturday morning, I exchanged thoughts on the
subject with some experts, notably Mr S. L. Shakdher, India's leading authority
on Parliament. He candidly said: "Parliamentary democracy provides for
Government by discussion and debate -- and for an orderly struggle for power.
There is no scope in it for violence and for taking issues to the streets. The
system is based on tolerance and a certain willingness on the part of both the
Government and the Opposition to give and take. But what happened last week has
made a mockery of Parliament. Such occurrences will even sound its death knell.
We ignore the development at our peril."
Prof Madhu Dandavate, it may be recalled,
gave notice on Monday last week of the following motion: "That this House,
while welcoming the announcement by the Chief Public Prosecutor of Sweden to
initiate enquiry into the alleged bribes paid by Bofors in the Howitzer deal,
urges the Government to lodge a complaint with the Swedish authorities and seek
a thorough enquiry". The next day, he also gave notice of an adjournment
motion to discuss "the failure of the Union Government to endorse the
appeal of more than 100 MPs to the Chief Public Prosecutor of Sweden to enquire
into the alleged payment of bribes by Bofors ..." The Minister of
Parliamentary Affairs, Mr H.K.L. Bhagat, thereupon said that the Government was
ready for an immediate discussion on Prof. Dandavate's earlier motion. However,
a Muslim League member, Mr G.M. Banatwala, intervened to remind that the House
had already agreed to discuss communal disturbances, a subject which had been
hanging fire for five weeks. The Speaker, Mr Bal Ram Jakhar, then ruled that communalism
was the country's burning issue number one and a discussion on the subject
would get precedence.
The matter ended there for the moment and
the House took up further discussion of the Indo-Sri Lanka Agreement. Prof
Dandavate and other Opposition MPs concluded from the Speaker's ruling that the
motion urging enquiry by the Swedish Public Prosecutor would be up only on
Wednesday or later. (The Business Advisory Committee, which is presided over by
the Speaker, had decided that communal disturbances be discussed thoroughly the
whole of Tuesday and, if necessary, on the next day also.) The discussion on
Indo-Sri Lanka Agreement concluded at 4 p.m. whereupon the House took up
discussion on communal disturbances. But the discussion had gone on for barely
an hour and a half when Mr Bhagwat Jha Azad, Congress-I, proposed out of the
blue that the House should take up the two items listed in the supplementary
agenda, just circulated. The first item related to Prof Dandavate's motion on
Bofors. The second item, moved by Mr Azad, welcomed the Government's efforts to
ascertain facts relating to payments made by Bofors and urged the Joint
Parliamentary Committee to conduct the probe expeditiously.
Taken greatly by surprise, Prof Dandavate
strongly protested against the move as most senior MPs, according to him, had
already left for the day. Furthermore, it was wrong to propose discussion of
the supplementary agenda without adequate notice when the House was busy
holding a serious debate on the communal situation. But Mr Azad and other
Congress-I MPs insisted on taking up the supplementary agenda. Pandemonium
broke out when Mr Azad went a step further and proposed suspension of rules to
push ahead with the discussion. The Opposition again objected. But, to cut a long
story short, Mr Azad's proposal was declared carried by the Deputy Speaker, Mr.
Thambi Durai, who was in the Chair. Prof. Dandavate was next asked by Mr Durai
to move his motion. When the Janata Leader refused to do so on the ground that
it was unfair to rush the resolution, Mr Azad moved his motion at 6.25 p.m.
amidst shouts and counter shouts. Three minutes later, at 6.28 p.m., according
to the Lok Sabha Bulletin, the motion was declared carried by the Deputy
Speaker amid continuing din in which nothing could be heard. House adjourned at
6.30 p.m. as the Opposition MPs walked out.
What precisely went wrong? Lots! In the
first place, there was no occasion for the supplementary agenda to be sprung
upon Prof Dandavate without any prior notice. He should have been spoken to on
the subject and his consent taken, in accordance with established practice and
convention. Secondly, the Deputy Speaker should never have agreed to let Mr
Azad propose suspension of the Rules. True, the Speaker and the Deputy Speaker
are servants of the House and not its masters. But the Presiding officers also
owe a basic responsibility to Parliament as the custodian of Parliamentary
privileges. In the circumstances, the Deputy Speaker should have firmly ruled
against interrupting the discussion on communal disturbances and permitting the
House to take up an important matter without the agreement of the Opposition
seeking such a debate. The rules might permit any Member to move for suspension
of the rules. But the Deputy Speaker should have taken due note of Prof
Dandavate's assertion in the best spirit of Parliamentary democracy: what is
admissible under the rules is not necessarily also advisable.
The Speaker did well to sort out matters
the following day when he ruled that the House and members should adhere to
past conventions and traditions. However, he did not cover himself with glory
when he took a technical view and asserted that no rules had been violated in
the circulation of the supplementary agenda on Tuesday and in the suspension of
the rules on a motion permitted to be moved by the Deputy Speaker. The Speaker
must know that what was done went against all conventions and practices
designed to ensure harmonious functioning of Parliament, its supremacy and
ascendancy. Parliament is sovereign in regard to its functioning, not the
rules. In fact, the two Houses have been given the power to suspend rules for a
purpose: to ensure their functioning in the best national interest in case the
rules are found to come in the way. Incidentally, the Lok Sabha debated on
adjournment motions the Teachers Strike in Calcutta in 1954, firing in Bhangi
Colony in 1957 and the Assam language riots in 1971 overlooking the rules and
procedures. Democracy, it needs to be remembered, is sustained by discussion
and debate, not by shutting these out.
Mr Bhagat, too, did well to make gracious
amends. He conceded in the Lok Sabha on Wednesday that he should have informed
Prof Dandavate earlier in the afternoon that his resolution was coming up for
discussion. He also said it was "a lapse" on his part and that he was
sorry for the same. Nevertheless, there is need for the ruling party to
understand that the arbitrary and dictatorial method used by it to prevent Prof
Dandavate’s a motion from being discussed will only push our Parliamentary
democracy towards destruction. Every reasonable effort must be made by the
ruling party to ensure debate. Heavens would not have fallen if the discussion
had been held a day later on Wednesday, as urged by Mr Indrajit Gupta, CPI. At
any rate, the ruling party has only hurt itself by clumsily and brazenly
blocking Prof. Dandavate’s motion and giving the unfortunate impression that it
was opposed to a probe by the Swedish Public Prosecutor. It would have been
better for it to have allowed a discussion and to oppose Prof. Dandavate’s
potion with arguments. It has also not helped its image by adopting Mr Azad's
motion without any discussion.
Not a little bitterness has also been
caused among the Opposition for what came to pass on Friday when the ruling
party used its majority to "kill" the following resolution moved by
Prof Dandavate: The House urges the Government of India to take the people and
Parliament into confidence in revealing the details about various defence deals
and FERA violations brought out by the recently-published reports and documents
and publish a comprehensive White paper on such defence deals and major FERA
violations since 1980." The Professor’s resolution was to be taken up
after discussion on a resolution on tribal welfare was completed during the
day. But the ruling party decided to extend the discussion and suddenly fielded
another 30 names, notwithstanding the fact that debate on the subject had gone
on for three Fridays, when Private Members' business is taken up. Prof
Dandavate promptly said he had no objection to extending the discussion and
asked that he be allowed a minute at the end to move his resolution so that it
could survive until the next session and not lapse. But the ruling party
refused to oblige and the resolution stood scuttled.
Tactics and tricks are no doubt an
important part of the Parliamentary game. Either side is entitled to try and
catch the other on the wrong foot. Nevertheless, certain basic norms have to be
upheld by the Members themselves or, in the last analysis, by the Presiding
officers. Every consideration should have been extended to Prof Dandavate in
accordance with the spirit and conventions of a healthy democracy. The Deputy
Speaker should have ensured that the ruling party did not set up wrong
precedents and thereby made a mockery of the system. We would do well to recall
what Pandit Pant observed on September 24, 1958. He said: "Everything that
is in this House serves as a precedent for the future. The conventions that we
build are not only for today or tomorrow, not in respect of any particular
Government but also in respect of all that night happen hereafter, whether in
this Parliament or in State Legislature or in connection with the relationship
between the States and the Centre.” Wise words indeed. We can ignore them only
at the cost of Parliament and its future..--- INFA
(Copyright,
News and Feature Alliance)
|
|
Agricultural Productivity: CUTTING EMISSIONS VITAL, By Dhurjati Mukherjee, 20 December 2023 |
|
|
Open Forum
New Delhi, 20 December 2023
Agricultural Productivity
CUTTING EMISSIONS VITAL
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
Increasing
agricultural productivity is undoubtedly a national goal, more so as India is
thinking of emerging as a major producer in this field. With the standard of
living improving, the variety in food consumption is also showing a healthy
trend. But with the increase in population, the need for higher productivity is
critical keeping in view the future requirements. In fact, FAO estimated that
by 2050, the world will need to produce almost 50 percent more food, feed and
biofuel, than it did in 2012. It projected that feeding a world population of
9.3 billion people in 2050 implied that food production in developing countries
must double from that in 2005-07.
Though
this projection may change considering the ground reality and the availability
of land and water, which are already stumbling blocks, not just in India but
many other nations, production undoubtedly needs a big boost. Climate change
may also add significantly to the pressure on availability of natural resources
for farming. Additionally, is the crucial factor of reducing emissions and
ensuring green strategies in farming, one of the key issues before the just
concluded COP28, which wanted reduction “in methane emissions globally” by
2030. This has the potential to impact India severely with its increasing
number of livestock and huge paddy cultivation.
A closer
look suggests that the need for increasing yield in a populous country like
India was realised long back by the renowned agricultural scientist, Dr M. S. Swaminathan.
Agricultural scientists since his time have suggested certain measures which
include double cropping, better rotation of crops, fighting plant diseases and
pests, etc. However, it may be noted that “productivity enhancing
investment in agriculture, however, depends not only on the state of knowledge
but also on conditions governing the adoption of technology; it depends on the
land tenure system which determines how the agricultural produce is divided
between owners of land and agricultural labour; on the terms of trade between
agriculture and industry, which determine the relative cheapness of industrial
inputs vis-a-vis agricultural produce; and on the level of demand of
agricultural produce.”
Though
on the institutional front, the government has been trying in a limited manner
to solve the problems of agriculture through land reforms and, on the
technological front, a modest beginning has been made in motivating farmers to
use of improved implements, seeds, chemicals, manures, etc., much more needs to
be done. Small farmers at the grass-root levels need training and support,
which regrettably is not forthcoming from the local administration.
There is
a crucial problem in most parts of the country with regard to water, which has
been a hindrance to the spread of irrigation facilities and since the time of
Dr Swaminathan the need for sustainable agriculture has been emphasised. But
productivity increase has been seen as intrinsically opposed to, or at best, in
competition with sustainability. The possibility of convergence between higher
productivity and environmental sustainability is, no doubt, a vital challenge
of the day.
The
tenet of environmental sustainability inevitably necessitates the need for
ensuring higher levels of food production without expansion in cropland through
deforestation. Thus, resource use efficiency must be the focal point of
attention in the coming years as it will be logically impossible to attain food
as also nutrition security for a growing population with a sustainable
footprint. This has been well understood and, as per available figures, just
around 11 percent of the overall increase in crop production in the last half a
century can be attributed to the expansion of cropland area.
The more
important aspect is the application of biotechnology, in terms of transgenic
technology to breed crops with higher productivity and better resistance to
biotic and a biotic shocks. Experts have opined that developments in
biotechnology are increasingly being seen as essential to the cause of
environmental sustainability, whether in terms of climate change mitigation or
the reduced use of nitrogenous fertilizers in growing cereal crops. Though the
potential of technology cannot be doubted, the effect on soil fertility remains
a big question.
Another
crucial aspect is the nutritional aspect, more so because a considerable part
of the Indian population is vegetarian. A recent study found that India’s rice
and wheat varieties have lost essential health-friendly minerals and accumulated
toxic elements, showing a decline in grain nutrient make-up that they say
remained largely neglected. According to the study, the concentration of
essential elements including calcium, iron and zinc in grains from present-day
cultivated rice and wheat varieties are between 19 to 45 percent lower than in
grains from the 1960s. However, present-day wheat grains have lower levels of
arsenic and chromium than wheat from the 1960s, as per the study, just
published in the journal, Scientific Reports.
Undoubtedly,
the depletion of essential minerals might have adverse health impacts as
calcium is needed for bone formation, iron for haemoglobin and zinc for
immunity and reproductive and neurological health. Increase in protein
consumption is essential and this cannot solely be found in pulses and legumes
but also in milk and eggs, which most vegetarians in the country consume. The
population, particularly children need to be given more calories, proteins
and fat as a move towards providing the population a healthy diet.
While
technology is imperative in boosting productivity, there is need to consider
the environmental aspect and synergy with nature. In India, there are
innumerable small peasants who have a critical role to play in sustainable
agricultural growth through use of natural fertilizers, local
production-consumption cycles, energy and technological sovereignty. Indigenous
knowledge can be equally effective though not as much as integrative science,
but the former could be more sustainably superior if a harmonious relationship
has to be developed with nature.
Though a
section of scientists has maintained that many local practices are
inefficient, it can very well be said that genetic engineering can be
instrumental in preserving some of these practices by upgrading their
mechanisms and making them more resource efficient and productive. In a
country like India, where around 60 percent of labour force is dependent on
agriculture, there has to be a synergy between biotechnology and genetic
engineering, on the one hand, and indigenous knowledge on the other, to ensure
environmental sustainability.
Apart
from this, farming can’t be made high cost and capital intensive as a
significant section are small farmers and resort to traditional methods of
cultivation. Alternative agriculture is no doubt the need of the day, and this must
incorporate the country’s traditional knowledge and practices, combined with
appropriate low-cost technologies. The policy makers need to keep this in mind
along with the backdrop of protecting nature, reducing emissions and ensuring
environmental sustainability. A holistic strategy will help in the long run.---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Government Vs Opposition: TIME TO BREAK LOGJAM, By Poonam I Kaushish, 19 December 2023 |
|
|
Political Diary
New Delhi, 19 December 2023
Government Vs
Opposition
TIME TO BREAK LOGJAM
By Poonam I Kaushish
It’s the season of surprises with
BJP appointing unknown, faceless and low key MLAs as Chief Ministers in Madhya
Pradesh, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh. But the element of bombshell didn’t end
there. Shocking scenes were
played out in sanitized Parliament’s Lok Sabha when two intruders jumped from
the visitor’s gallery into the chamber, desk-hopping, deploying coloured smoke
from canisters and raising slogans against authoritarianism till they were
overpowered by MPs and House marshals Wednesday 13 December. Succinctly, another
security breach reminiscent of the terror attack on Parliament on the same day
2001.
Predictably all hell broke loose with Opposition’s INDIA
bloc demanding Home Minister Shah’s statement on the serious security lapse and
Treasury Benches refusing to do so, notwithstanding Speaker Birla making clear
“Government cannot intervene in responsibilities of Lok Sabha secretariat’s
purview. Security inside House is under me.” Suggesting Government should not
be held accountable.
Already, Delhi Police
has arrested all 6 culprits and slapped the stringent anti-terror law Unlawful
Activities (Prevention) Act on them who confessed it was to draw attention to
unemployment, farmers issue and Manipur violence. Even as police look into the
larger conspiracy behind the incident, their preliminary submission is that the
“mastermind” wished to create “anarchy” in the country.
Naturally this failed to satisfy Opposition resulting in another
shocker for them: 78 Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha MPs were suspended yesterday for
“misconduct”, staging protests, displaying playcards, rushing in to the well and disobeying Chair’s directions for the remaining part of
the winter session which ends Friday. This includes Congress leader of the
House, senior TMC, DMK, RJD leaders etc. With 14 suspended last week this
totals 92 Right Honourables.
Certainly, Opposition has a point, “Our demand is Shah make
a statement in Parliament but Prime Minister Modi prefers to speak to a
newspaper and Home Minister to a TV channel on Parliament’s security breach but
refuses to speak in the House which is
the correct forum for them to speak.”
Prime Minister Modi brushed this aside advising Opposition against
any “vaad-vivaad” (debate) or “pratirodh” (protest) over the breach. “The
gravity of the incident should not be underestimated. Speaker has been taking
steps needed with all seriousness….Investigative agencies are inquiring
strictly. Let investigations be completed before any discussion is held. Efforts
should be made to look for a solution with a collective spirit,” appearing to
suggest the Opposition should suspend its protests.
BJP added its two bits by trying to connect some of the
protestors to political outfits arrayed with Opposition and with at least one
of them having earlier participated in demonstrations against farm laws.
But the Opposition refused to heed and obtusely continues
to display lung power, accusing the Government of shunning debate to escape
questions over role of the BJP Parliamentarian who
recommended the two canister-carrying youths secure Lok Sabha passes to the
visitors’ gallery.
Questionably, it
stands to reason that before Parliament debate the breach our Right Honourables
should study the findings of the investigation committee set up by the Home
Ministry. The break-in calls for an informed debate whereby security concerns
of all members can be addressed.
Certainly, protests
within and outside Parliament are legitimate but this is not to make a case for
boorish or unruly behaviour in both Houses of Parliament. By refusing to do so,
tantamounts to dereliction of duty as it is an avoidable confrontation. As MPs
they owe it to their constituents to discuss, debate and legislate issues of
vital interest to them. For even as Opposition have their say, Government has
its way.
Besides, even as INDIA block displays its lung power amidst
shouts of dictatorship, bulldozing Opposition and death of democracy, they fail
to remember 15 March 1989 when 63 lawmakers were suspended from Parliament during
Congress Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi era over tabling of the Justice Thakkar
Commission of Inquiry on Indira Gandhi’s assassination.
With more than 400 MPs, the Congress Government then
enjoyed a brute majority, much like BJP now. The only difference being then the
suspension was for three days, today it for remainder of Parliament’s session.
Remarked a senior BJP leader acidly, “If Congress claims that suspension of its
MPs is a black day for democracy, who set the 89 benchmark?”
What next? Amidst the continuing logjam and penchant for
notching up brownie points, all conveniently brush under the carpet that Parliament
is a sacred symbol of our democracy. Any violation of its dignity is a serious
issue. The onus is on both Government and Opposition to ensure smooth running
of both Houses.
Further, floor managers of both sides need to reach a
compromise so that Parliament can function smoothly. This can happen only in a climate of mutual
trust and bonhomie which is sadly, absent today. Time for our MPs to realize
their key job is to legislate. More so, as crucial Bills like the three
Criminal Procedure Code Bills are to be debated and passed this session.
Remember, Parliamentary democracy does not begin and end
with elections, it’s a continuous process that carries on in the House and, in
collaboration with Opposition. The electorate takes a cue from Parliament. A
House that functions in a healthy atmosphere of dialogue, dissent and debate
sends out a positive message to people.
It remains to be seen if obstructionism will continue and
whether our polity will continue to drift along smugly without any shame,
desire to turn a new page. Of late one sees Treasury Benches passing crucial bills
thanks to Opposition providing a perfect escape by creating pandemonium. With the
functioning of Parliament costing Rs 2.5 lakhs per minute our Right Honourbles
need to be sternly told they cannot squander aam jantas’ money.
The time has come for all MPs to see how they can
strengthen Parliamentary democracy before people begin to mock them. One way is
that on policy matters and legislative business Treasury and Opposition Benches
rise above sectarian political loyalties and be guided by what the country
needs, the sense of the House than the rule book.
Another is to make the Executive accountable by taking a
leaf out of Westminster. The House of Commons has a-40 minutes a week “PM’s
Hour” convention wherein MPs can question him on any issue.
It needs to be remembered that Parliament is the bedrock of
our nation State. It represents citizens who expect it to function as the
sovereign watchdog of their national interest. Constitutionally, the Executive
is responsible and accountable to Parliament every second of the day. Its
survival depends on its enjoying the confidence of the Lok Sabha. Nothing more,
nothing less.
With sharp battle lines between Treasury and Opposition if this
distrust continues it will only further devalue Parliament and lower its image.
Thus, our leaders need to heed voices of reason. Tying up Parliament in trivia,
sans business does not behove the world’s largest democracy. Time to change the
rules to ensure accountability.
The value of this session will be gauged by its success in
moving the national conversation forward. As leader of the world’s largest
democracy Modi needs to remember a good statesman always learns from his
opposition than from his supporters. Alongside our Opposition MPs must introspect
about what kind of legacy they are going to leave behind. Will they allow
Parliament to sink under the weight of its increasing decadence? ---- INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Bengal Rises To 6th Rank: GDP SURGES TO $212 bn, By Shivaji Sarkar, 27 November 2023 |
|
|
Economic Highlights
New Delhi, 27 November 2023
Bengal Rises To 6th Rank
GDP SURGES TO $212 bn
By Shivaji Sarkar
Is West
Bengal on a trajectory of growth? Is it belying allegations of a laggard state?
May be. Ranked sixth on the development index, West Bengal is surprisingly
having investments in all its global summits during the past few years. It has
claimed to have implemented $121 billion of $190 billion promised in different
meets.
The
state has one of the finest growth rates at 8.41 percent and is continuing to
contribute to India’s $3 trillion economy with its GDP touching $212 billion or
Rs 17.5 lakh crore and per capita GDP of Rs 1.41 lakh.The last six investment
meets surprisingly have added to a different dimension. Called Bengal Global
Business Summits, these got the state bonanza, contrary to a general belief
that Bengal no more attracts the business community.Foreign direct investment
(FDI) inflows are at $53,356 million between March and June 2023. During
2020-23 the total FDI inflow was $155.784 million.
It was
over a century ago that social reformer and politician Gopal Krishna Gokhale
said, “What Bengal thinks today, India thinks tomorrow”. Somewhere after the
Partition amid myriad political developments Bengal lost the edge with problems
of central funding to flight of capital due to a bloodied history.
Additionally,
the change of central rule to BJP witnessed an intense clash of egos to violent
blows between its supporters and the TMC. Has it not thawed West Bengal?Perhaps
not. In June, the panchayat elections witnessed severe violence, seizure of
20,000 licensed weapons, loss of at least 50 lives, many from TMC and a
spectacular victory for it. Inexplicable! Even the Opposition is violent.
True.
According to the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project, an NGO
based in the US, the state recorded 3,338 incidents of political violence,
including political murders, between 2016 and July 2023, the highest number of
any state except militancy-riven Jammu and Kashmir. This is despite
the fact that it is much lower than in the vast and lawless nearby states of
Bihar and Uttar Pradesh.
Political
violence has not stopped West Bengal from going ahead. Before independence and
till mid 1960s it was leading the industrial development. A little over a
decade back Trinamool Congress of Mamata Banerjee rode to power with the
opposition of CPM inviting the Tatas to set up the Nano car plant at Singur,
over farmland. Many consider that to be a loss and others a step forward to
free it from the communists.
It has
not thawed the growth of West Bengal though political foes say it is slow. May
be. But one grace that the state has, unlike many others is that its middle and
small units (MSMEs) are still thriving. The state is home to 90 lakh MSME units
employing 1.3 crore people. It also has a large leather manufacturing complex,
which is being expanded to be the biggest in Asia apart from a vibrant IT hub.
Kolkata,
rather the erstwhile international Calcutta, remains one of the fastest growing
real estate hubs. It is considered the most liveable cities with the lowest
cost of living and a vibrant culture and cuisine. Its eating hubs and
restaurants are big draws. The increase in Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP)
is almost four times, revenue grew almost four times, the total budget has
increased about 3.8 times, and capital expenditure has grown nine times, says Chief
Minister Mamata Banerjee at a global meet.
State
tax collection has doubled in four years, while spending on infrastructure has
tripled and deficits are down, she says. The statistics show that per capita
income grew nearly 13 percent in real terms last year in West Bengal, compared
with an all-India increase of 6 percent.The total state’s tax revenue as per
the budget estimates for 2023-24 is slated to increase by 12.69 per cent
to Rs 88,595.54 crore from Rs 79,5000 crore in estimates for 2022-23,
according to a PRS analysis. A decade back, in 2013, it was Rs 41000 crore.
Mamata
Banerjee has cancelled the letter of intent for Tajpur deep sea port to a
leading industrialist group, the Adanis. She says it would be given to some new
bidder.Many others offer to invest in the state. Reliance Industries Chairman
Mukesh Ambani has decided to invest Rs 20,000 crore in three years. The company
has already invested Rs 45,000 crore. The new investments are in telecom,
bio-energy and retail. The Reliance Foundation has taken up a project to
renovate the Kalighat Temple as well as it has taken over the hold of its
trust.
Many
others like the JK organisation decide to return to West Bengal, says Harsh
Pati Singhania, Vice-Chairman and Managing Director of JK Paper. They are
setting up a dairy project. The JK organisation was returning to West Bengal,
he said, while announcing new dairy project in Kharagpur.
West
Bengalsays Banerjee has faltered because of the difficult conditions in the
1960s and 1970s. “But now there is resurgence. Investments are flowing in, and
there is an industrial upsurge.” Apart from a slew of domestic companies, 35
countries joined the BGBS this year. Of these 17 countries have been chosen as
partner countries, including the UK, Australia, Germany, Japan, France, South
Korea, Malaysia, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Poland,
Republic, Kenya, Rwanda and Fiji.
The
state unveils five new policies – West Bengal Logistics Policy, WB Internet
Cable Landing Station Policy, WB Export Promotion Policy, WB Green Hydrogen
Policy, and WB New and Renewable Energy Manufacturing Promotion Policy. It is
trying for a big push in the maritime sector with the two planned major ports
of Tajpur and Kulpi. It has the largest warehousing capacity in eastern part of
the country as well as claims to have the second-largest cold storage capacity
in the country. With transports like rail, and shipping routes opening through
Bangladesh, the state is also catering to the trade and businesses of the North-East.
Connections planned to Sittwe port in Myanmar, its trade from Kolkata and
Haldia are supposed to increase.
Despite
its political conflicts, West Bengal’s debt-GSDP as per a Niti Ayog survey has
come down to below 34 percent from 41.9 percent in 2010-11. The fiscal deficit
scenario is also improving from 4.2 percent in 2011 to 2.96 percent. The state
is making strides, aiming at getting back its 30 percent industrial share of
India, as it was at the time of independence. There is no looking back. ----INFA
(Copyright, India News and
Feature Alliance)
|
|
MP Meat Ban Disturbing: CAN RISK GLOBAL BIZ, By Shivaji Sarkar, 18 December 2023 |
|
|
Economic Highlights
New
Delhi, 18 December 2023
MP Meat Ban Disturbing
CAN RISK GLOBAL BIZ
By Shivaji Sarkar
The new Union
Budget will be tabled in less than two months from now and is supposed to pave
the course of the biggest popular electoral process in the world. In a rising
world inflationary situation and uncertainties all around in West Asia to
Europe, would India be able to keep off the difficult realities amid the US Fed
move to cut rates?
More
than that some decisions such as the Madhya Pradesh government banning egg and
meat product sales could have serious repercussions. If it becomes the norm
also in other states like Rajasthan or Chhattisgarh, the country may goo though
a difficult phase.
India
being the highest seller of buffalo and other meat products would be having a
dichotomy. In Madhya Pradesh alone there are 60 producers who export rabbit,
crab, emu, chicken, pork, buffalo and a variety of other meat products. Would
they be functioning? If they are made to shut down, India’s global business
phenomenon could be treated as fickle paving way for flight of capital.
The new
syndrome could lead to law and order and difficult business-oriented
phenomenon. Number of non-vegetarians are high. Most tribals are meat
eaters. There could be law and order problems apart from clandestine sales
and smuggling. Rent seeking could be high. Perhaps in lure of propaganda for flaunting
religiosity, the new leaders have barged on to an uncharted course. The central
government has been making efforts to increase all sorts of exports, which are
seeing a decline for some time.
This
might aggravate the US rate-cut syndrome and impact the budgetary process. In
normal circumstances it is expected to pour in the US and western funding.
Besides, it would also depend on how the Israel-Hamas situation impacts overall
the US monetary movements. It is raising losses for Israel in terms of casualties
and a daily loss of an estimated $269 million. The heavy assaults in Gaza have
its own repercussions. The businesses are suffering in Israel and its economy
heads for contraction. Its political repercussions are not easy to predict,
particularly in a year that the US heads for polls and sustains many of the
losses of Israel.
India,
of late, has been seeking closer ties with Israel. Haifa port investments by
the Adani group is considered strategic for financial gains and diplomatic
clout. Besides, the disturbed West Asia has so far almost jettisoned the
India-Europe Middle East trade corridor that was to pass through the region. It
could have benefitted Indian companies immensely.
The
rate-cut was expected to lead to higher US investments in India and softening
of the dollar. Each year that hope has been belied with dollar getting more
expensive vis a vis rupee adding additional costs on Indian imports and higher
forex outgo. On exports, it fetches fewer dollars. Outgo has increased on both
counts.
Despite
petroleum prices falling, India has not been able to pass on the benefit to
consumers. The rupee outgo has increased and cannot sail through even a softer
international fuel price regime as dollar remains firm and hovers over Rs 83.
It’s servicing on external debt of $629.1 billion is increasing.
The US
dollar-denominated debt remained the largest component of India’s external
debt, with a share of 54.4 per cent at end-June 2023, followed by debt
denominated in the Indian rupee (30.4 per cent), SDR (5.9 per cent), yen (5.7
per cent), and the euro (3.0 per cent).
India’s “Vikasit
Bharat” narrative has led to demand for higher debt. The government says it
was investing in the growth of India. Inflation was 7.4 percent in July and in
November it is at 5.8 percent, a little below the Reserve Bank of India
tolerance range of 6.5 percent. This means prices may go up further in normal
domestic situation. If international situation worsens it would add to the
pains of budgetary process.
Surprise
was the growth at 7.6 percent in the second quarter. It also sees rise in
wholesale price index rising after a seven-month thaw. The concerns over rising
prices are on the minds of the policymakers. Pulses and cereals denote
significant rise in CPI food basket. Quite a few items’ prices such as onion,
ginger, and garlic are rising continuously. Despite the ban on wheat exports,
the prices have risen by about 25 percent. On the contrary, the farmers are not
getting remunerative prices.
The meat
ban could increase “illicit sales” or smuggling of meat products, particularly
in urban areas. Higher rents would add to inflation, costs on policing and
harassment of business couriers vitiating the social atmosphere. All this increases
costs and may lead to rework the budgetary process.
If there
are social disturbances, as the Lok Sabha election approaches nearer, Indian
companies, renowned for their resilience and adaptability, creating
opportunities amid global challenges, may get into a financial morass. It could
also affect the ability to innovate, leverage technology, and respond
swiftly.Such prudery also affects international business companies. Alarmed by
such moves they might take decisions to postpone investments despite the
additional finances likely to be available to the US investors.
The
changed milieu could create a stickiness that the US is trying to overcome.
International community keeps a close watch on socio-political developments. An
awry politico-social phenomenon in one part may have wider ramifications. The
Manipur crisis has yet to subside. Mizoram has voted in a different way and the
new BJP states are acting differently. These may not be considered welcome
indicators by many global players, who are intrigued by increasing ethnic
disturbances at different places.
Global
disruptions in supply chains, accentuated by events like the trade tensions
between major economies, have prompted a reassessment of manufacturing and
supply chain strategies. Indian companies, particularly in sectors like
electronics, textiles, and pharmaceuticals, may have to drastically diversify
or relocate to ensure they remain profitable.
The
inauguration of the Ram temple in Ayodhya is being seen as a jubilant phase in
the society. If it gives rise to prudery, it might have undesirable impact on
the ease of doing business. It is hoped that it might end in a whimper and
would not majorly change the business syndrome.
Any
aberration could alter the business course. The leadership has to be pragmatic
so that the economy thrives and does not get into a whirlpool that could
disrupt economy, finance and political stability. Steering it deftly is the
need of the hour.---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
| | << Start < Previous 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Next > End >>
| Results 118 - 126 of 5990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|