|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Diary
PM Modi in Bhutan: SOLIDIFYING HISTORICAL TIES, 29 March 2024 |
|
|
Round The World
New Delhi, 29 March 2024
PM Modi in Bhutan
SOLIDIFYING HISTORICAL TIES
By Prof. (Dr.) D.K. Giri
(Secretary General, Assn for Democratic Socialism)
Prime
Minister Narendra Modi’s visit to Bhutan on 21-22 March was significant for
more than one reason. It was to counter China which is aggressively penetrating
to India’s neighbourhood. Recently, through the border talks, Beijing sent
overtures to Bhutan in order to dilute New Delhi’s historic ties with Thimphu. Second,
despite the pressure of electioneering, Modi dashed to Bhutan underscoring the
importance New Delhi attaches to its neighbourhood first policy. Third,
conferring the Order of the Druk Gyalpo on Prime Minister Modi is an evidence
of reciprocal importance Thimphu places on its ties with India. This honour is
the highest award Bhutan gives to anyone including all orders, decorations and
medals. The honour is testimony of India’s commitment to Bhutan’s growth,
prosperity and security.
Political
observers have wondered how a small country like Bhutan could be friendly for
so many years with a much bigger country like India. Bhutan has a geographically
area of 38,394 sq kms and a population of about 7.7 lakh whereas India’s territory
consists of 3.28 million sq kms and population of 140 crore plus. The asymmetry
in size and population is huge. Yet both the countries have remained the
closest partners in the region for over last 50 years and more. This is because
India treats other countries with respect and as equals as it should be between
two sovereign countries irrespective of their size and resources. Bhutan has
been having the trust and confidence in India to help it grow. India in return,
has lived up to that expectation.
The
latest in the bilateral relations between Bhutan and India is the development
of Gelephu project which is being built as a special economic zone to attract
foreign investment and advance prosperity for the Bhutanese kingdom. At the
same time, this is being developed as a Mindfulness city with environmental
security and spiritual well-being as the foremost concerns. The project will
focus on all-round human well-being with practices of yoga, relaxation,
recreation and spa therapies etc.
The
visit of King of Bhutan Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck in November 2023 was to
highlight the need and significance of such a project. The King spent quite a
bit of time both with Prime Minister Modi and President of India Draupadi
Murmu. Also, Bhutan’s Prime Minister Tshering Tobgay was in New Delhi just a
week before Modi’s visit. They had a lengthy discussion in Delhi. The
back-to-back visits by the Heads of governments of both countries signify the
attention placed on the relationship which manifests in their evolving
closeness.
Hydropower
cooperation is the main pillar of India’s relations with Bhutan. Several
hydropower joint projects have been commissioned and completed by both the
countries that supply clean electricity to India and Bhutan with a regular flow
of revenue. The delayed Punatsangchhu-II hydropower project is expected to be
completed in 2024. However, some rethinking is called for as several other
joint ventures on hydropower generation have not taken off.
The Government
of India has declared to double its development assistance from Rs 5,000 crore
in the 12th Five-Year Plan of Bhutan to Rs 10,000 crore. This is
quite a significant development. Prime Minister Modi inaugurated a women and
child hospital built with India’s support. Bilateralism with Bhutan in multiple
sectors has grown under the basic framework of India-Bhutan bilateral relations
in the form of Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation signed in 1949 and revised
in 2007.
Prime
Minister Modi’s visit had at least three dividends. First, it gave strong
message that India is committed to Bhutan’s development particularly in terms
of support to the upcoming Gelephu project that would facilitate India’s
increase in financial support. Second, Bhutan is an integral part of India’s
massive infrastructure initiative and also for energy exchanges. Both these
sectors are pushing sub-regional trade and trade and travel between India,
Bangladesh, Bhutan and Nepal. Third, the message through the visit should be
loud and clear that India is wary of Bhutan’s increased engagement with China. New
Delhi may reconcile to Bhutan signing a boundary agreement with Beijing but
will not brook China’s incursion into trade and investment in Bhutan. Beijing
has done so with India’s other close neighbours.
Without
doubt, New Delhi is concerned about the ongoing talks between Bhutan and China
on boundary agreement. In fact, the possible swap of land at Doklam to Bhutan’s
west is a threat to India’s Siliguri Corridor and it could threaten India’s
border connectivity projects in Arunachal Pradesh. Note that, Bhutan-China
boundary talks focus only on areas to Bhutan’s west and north, but China’s new
claims to Bhutan’s East have raised fears that Beijing is using these claims to
put pressure on Bhutan to fast-track the boundary talks or risk broadening the
disputed areas.
As
Bhutan appeared to be lenient to Beijing, Modi’s visit underlined India’s
perspective on the border talks. Accepting the award, Modi said, “India-Bhutan
ties are unbreakable and urged that India and Bhutan should remain vigilant about
their ties in the face of challenges within their countries as well as in the
neighbourhood.
Modi’s
visit to Bhutan, after the elections were announced, has raised some eyebrows.
Some people commented that he could go as a caretaker Prime Minister but cannot
initiate or conclude any agreements. Such visits during the operation of Code
of Conduct are perhaps unusual. But given the strategic importance of visit,
new conventions could be created in the national interest. So, the gesture was
meant to denote India’s commitment to Bhutan in particular and to the
government’s “neighbourhood first” policy.
In order
to enhance the bilateral relations, in the immediate future, New Delhi could
perhaps think of commencing direct flights from Mumbai/Delhi and Gelephu which
will increase the tourist traffic to Bhutan. Indians are looking for
alternative tourist sites after a bad spat in social media with Maldivians. New
Delhi also could transfer the knowledge and technology in building the Mindful
city; encourage business to set up retail shops in the city. The success of
Gelephu project will have economic spill-over in West Bengal and Assam region.
New
Delhi will have to react swiftly whenever China seeks to open an entry point to
inch nearer India threatening her security. Remember, China’s so-called ‘String
of Pearls’ in the Indian Ocean region to encircle India. Also, India should
always remember Mao Zedong’s Five Fingers of Tibet. China considers Tibet to be
its right hand palm with five fingers in its periphery – Ladakh, Nepal, Sikkim,
Bhutan and Arunachal Pradesh. Modi has done well to visit Bhutan at this
juncture. New Delhi should keep up the momentum even after the elections.---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Politics Of Poverty: ARE POOR BETTER OFF?, By Dhurjati Mukherjee, 27 March 2024 |
|
|
Open Forum
New Delhi, 27 March 2024
Politics Of Poverty
ARE POOR BETTER OFF?
By Dhurjati Mukherjee
Lok
Sabha elections announced, all political parties are gearing up to woo the
electoral vote bank, specially the poor and reeling out promises and policies
if brought to power. Social security measures are being spelt out, but none specifically
talk of poverty eradication, though poverty analysis is an ongoing subject with
poverty lines being drawn based on different stipulations by varied agencies from
time to time. However, the fact remains that most of these analyses,
particularly of governments, are somewhat theoretical propositions and are
quite different from the ground reality. This is because the lack of
involvement of civil society groups during the process of collection of data as
also the trend to show lesser people are below the poverty line.
Recall
the somewhat irrational assessment by the chief of Niti Aayog stating that
poverty stands at just 5 per cent in the country. This observation drew flak
from different international organisations, not just Oxfam, though none thought
it worthwhile to comment. Such an observation may not be surprising, because in
reality the true conditions of the masses in the rural areas, specially the
backward districts of the country, are best hidden. Moreso, as every government
would seek to claim having improved their lot.
Judging
independently, while the political leadership makes tall claims, the agents of
political parties are found torturing the impoverished and backward sections
and grabbing their land though all this has not been adequately focussed in the
media, only scattered reports of the neglect that the poor face. The ground
situation doesn’t get the national attention as the information from grass-root
leaders is kept in wraps and the gap between the rich and the poor is startling.
The very
recent survey released by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) is an
indictor as its Household Consumption Expenditure Survey (HCSE) showed that the
richest 5 per cent of urban Indian households spend nearly 10 times more than
the poorest 5 per cent on food and other necessities such as children’s
education, medical treatment, clothing and transport during 2022-23. In rural
areas, the rich 5 per cent spend nearly eight times more than the poorest 5 per
cent, whose daily expenditure is as low as Rs 46.
Nine
states, including West Bengal, Odisha, Jharkhand, Bihar and Assam, lagged
behind the national average. In 2011-12, the average nationwide Monthly Per
Capita Consumption Expenditure (MPCE) figures were Rs 1459 and Rs 2630
respectively for rural and urban areas. This is obvious due to the fact that
the northern and eastern states lag behind those in western and southern part
of India. Judged from all angles, education, health and basic facilities are
grossly lacking in these states.
It has
been shown that rural monthly per capita consumption spending rose 164 per cent
from Rs 1430 in 2011-12 to Rs 3773 in 2022-23 whereas in urban centres, it shot
up 148 per cent from Rs 2630 to Rs 6459 during the same period. But during this
11-year period, there has been a perceptible increase in prices of food items
and this, on modest terms, almost doubled while, in some cases, to be more
accurate increased by around 80 per cent.
Any
analysis or report reveals the average, but this is somewhat misleading as this
does not quite reflect the spending power of the bottom 25 per cent of the
rural population. The inflationary conditions that have been manifest, both
during and after the pandemic severely affected the rural poor. While incomes
of at least 50 to 60 per cent becoming stagnant during the period comparisons
have been made, there can be no reason to feel that the poor or the
economically weaker sections are well off by any standards. Moreover, the very
fact that the government decided to give free rations to 80 crore people for 5
years proves that this section needs support.
Even for
the rich, the survey showed that the top 5 per cent in rural areas spend Rs
10,551 per month but this appears a gross understatement. Similarly, the 5 per cent
richest in urban areas are found to spend Rs 20,821. This finding, according to
several economists, is not quite correct as such people, who own multiple cars
and live in palatial bungalows and even go on foreign jaunts for shopping, the
figures are more than double of what has been revealed in the survey. While
accepting that surveys often grossly underestimate the spending of the rich, in
this instant case, the inaccuracy seems quite blatant.
Another
interesting finding related to the investigation of the poverty scenario is
India’s prevalence of so-called ‘zero-food’ children who have not eaten
anything whatsoever over a 24-hour period, assessed through snapshot surveys,
is comparable to the prevalence rates in the West African nations of Guinea,
Benin, Liberia and Mali. A study that used data from the Union Health Ministry’s
national family health survey for 2019-2021 estimated India’s prevalence of
zero-food children at 19.3 per cent, the third highest after Guinea’s 21.8 per cent
and Mali’s 20.5 per cent. The comparable figures are much lower in Bangladesh
(5.6 per cent), Pakistan (9.2 per cent), Nigeria (8.8 per cent) and Ethiopia
(14.8 per cent).
The main
question that has arisen is whether the Niti Aayog has measured poverty based
on the government’s flagship programmes, ignoring the standard parameters
adopted the world over. The government’s recent growth figures suggested the
consumption growth was 4.4 per cent. If people are getting more money, why are
they not buying basic stuff such as soap, hair oil, toothpaste, biscuit and so
on? The fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) sector is not quite growing with
the slow consumption demand in the rural areas.
Finally,
it needs to be reiterated that tackling poverty or upgrading incomes of the
bottom layers of the population, specially in the rural and backward areas,
calls for a different approach to development. First and foremost is the need
for imposition of a ‘super tax’ of 2 per cent, or at least 1 per cent, on the
net wealth of the 167 wealthiest families in 2022-23 which would yield 0.5 per cent
or 0.25 per cent of national income in revenues and create valuable fiscal
space to fight poverty related issues.
Moreover,
innumerable projects, most of which are geared for the metropolises and cities,
must change, keeping in view not just the poverty and squalor of villagers but
also the significant benefits in numbers if even 50 per cent of the projects
are executed in rural areas. It is time that the political leadership adhere to
the recommendations of economists and sociologists and give a new thrust
to the rural sector. And while some good work has been done in recent years, much
more needs to be desired. ---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Constitutional Morality: WHAT’S THE BIG DEAL?, By Poonam I Kaushish, 26 March 2024 |
|
|
Political Diary
New Delhi, 26 March 2024
Constitutional
Morality
WHAT’S THE BIG DEAL?
By Poonam I Kaushish
Circa July 2023: “Idealism is good in politics, but if you
are kicked out, who cares!” asserted Maharashtra Dy Chief Minister Fadnavis,
adding, “I can’t promise that I do ethical politics 100%.”
Circa March 2024: “I will rule from jail....where does the
Constitution say that a Chief Minister cannot rule from jail, ” thundered Delhi Chief Minister Kejriwal and
AAP Chief arrested by Enforcement
Directorate (ED) late Thursday after ignoring 9 summons for his role in
irregularities and kickbacks in the now scrapped 2021 Delhi liquor policy.
There is an unmissable irony in the anti-corruprtion
crusader being hoist with corruption petard. Certainly, the merits of the case
will be settled by courts and law will take its course but the big question is not
whether Kejriwal resigns or not, neither is it about a convicted Tamil Nadu
Minister’s whose sentence was stayed by Supreme Court being sworn-in as
Minister, but all about ‘Constitutional morality’ and the influence this will
have on the political narrative in the approaching elections and democratic
values and ethos in coming years.
Alongside, it raises disturbing questions about our
democracy. That it does not strike any chord among our leaders who have reduced
graft to a farcical political pantomime. There is no sense of outrage or shame.
Can one compromise on corruption? Does politics force an indulgence on issues
of governance and probity? Is this part of political dharma?
Whereby politics has everything to do with acceptability,
little with credibility and public life is all compromises, not principles
dripping morality sermons but not practicing it. Today, it is finally official.
Politics in India has nothing to do with morality, accountability and healthy
conventions. Taint is the flavour of the new electoral political season.
Wherein power and smear go saath-saath. A sense of de ja vu overwhelms.
In the past
few months there have been numerous cases filed against and arrests of
Opposition leaders by ED-CBI in Jharkhand, Telangana, Tamil Nadu and West
Bengal. Namely, Jharkhand Chief Minister Soren and BRS leader Kavitha.
Whereby, new definitions of Constitutional
morality have become staple diet post-Nehru era when Ministers resigned owning
moral responsibility even for a train accident. Proclaimed a Minister: “I
cannot be held guilty for any subordinate’s mistake. Otherwise, we will have a
spate of ministerial resignations landing on Prime Minister’s table every
day”.
Clearly Kejriwal-speak is
reminiscent of RJD Chief Lalu Yadav. Charge-sheeted over chara ghotala 1997, the ex-Bihar Chief Minister and Union Railway
Minister asserted, “Where does the Constitution say a Chief Minister duly
elected by people should resign merely on being charge-sheeted by policemen?
Who is CBI or Central Government to tell me to do so? I will rule from jail if
imprisoned... Kaunsi naitikta aur
bhrastaachar ki baat kar rahe hain. What has morality to do with politics?”
But even he resigned and anointed wife Rabri as Chief Minister.
In our netagans ‘moral’ vocabulary politics has
everything to do with acceptability, little with credibility and public life is
all compromises, not principles dripping morality sermons but not practicing
it. Wring your hands all you want, but that does not take away from the fact
that morality, honesty and integrity are words non-existent in political
vocabulary.
A fine distinction is
drawn between a “politically-motivated” charge and actual conviction. Such is
the intoxicating nasha of power that
all conveniently choose to shrug it off. Dismissed at best as an aberration and
at worst a squeaky knee with which one can live with.
More. If you are jaani dushman phir aap chor hai unfit to
rule, leave alone provide good and honest governance? If jigar dost, toh surf’s safedi
ki chamkan winners who can commit no sin, will go to any extent to prove
(sic) their honesty.
In this
you-scratch-my-back-I’ll-scratch-yours culture, our polity in their collective
conscience willingly abets. Taint, what are you talking about? What’s the big deal about it? Feigning
ignorance and playing dumb, blind and deaf about their corrupt misdemeanors.
Remember, an honest man is one who hasn’t been caught!
Whereby, every Party and its leaders
have perfected the art of beguiling saddling us with opportunists and liars.
Exposing the disdain with which our netagan
holds democracy and voters. Thereby, exposing politics of the worst kind,
cultivating low morality and high greed --- and need of the hour.
A power-play when
personality-oriented malicious vilification seems to have became the hallmark
of democracy. Sans shared ideology and mutual objectives. This pithily is aaj ki rajneeti.
Alas, so caught up in
the verbose of one-upmanship are all that none stops to think and ponder
implications of their actions. The tragedy? In this winner take-all-fight
governance and people go for a toss. Satta
batoan aur tamasha dekho! What matters is only the end game: Gaddi.
Questionably, does the
electorate want honest politicians and a clean Government? Are there no honest
and capable netas? Doesn’t seem so as
a "clean politician" sounds like an oxymoron, a breed that no longer
exists. Most distressing is that it doesn’t strike any chord anywhere.
Alas, in a chor-chor-mauser-bhai political milieu
our leaders have left it to the “call of conscience” of individual leaders.
Happily, all follow the principle of “politics of direct sale”. Appalling, none
have time for the gasping and groaning aam
aadmi who reels under the onslaught of spiralling prices and unemployment.
Moreover, we demand
moral responsibility only when we are short-changed. In this market model of
democracy it is a misnomer to believe that netas
are governed by ideology. Instead, there is a tendency to capture the imagination
of the people by creating a spectacle alongside money which makes the clogged,
polluted and corrupt political mare go around.
Importantly, India is
today at the moral crossroads. Gone are the days of Gandhi, Nehru and Patel.
The moot point is: Will immorality and taint be allowed to become the bedrock
of our Parliamentary democracy? Basically, is it good for democracy to have
such people as Ministers? When those who are supposed to lead become saboteurs,
it is time to call a spade a spade.
At stake today is not
only the functioning of the largest democracy but its moral agenda which is
more substantive than partisan politics. Consequently, where we go from here
would depend on how citizens use democratic levers available to them.
In this immoral
political desert and barren discourse, voters have to make tough calls. No
longer can we merely shrug our shoulders and dismiss it as political kalyug. Thus, in this game of lies,
deceit and deception, BJP, Congress and regional outfits reflect the emerging
truth of today’s India. Power is all. Arguably, one can say this is what
democracy is about.
The challenge lies in
overhauling our system of governance. The ‘Conduct of Politics’ necessitates morality,
values, reliability, integrity, credibility, conviction and courage. There
should be no scope for any lingering doubt or suspicion that politics is the
last refuge of a scoundrel. As nothing costs a nation more than cheap
politicians!
One can only recall
Prof. Galbraith: “There is nothing wrong with Indian laws or with its political
and judicial institutions. What ails India is the moral poverty”. Can a nation
continue to be bereft of all sense of shame and morality --- and for how long?
---- INFA
(Copyright
India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Shady US Funds Mould Poll Bonds: OPEN GATES FOR MURKY DEALS, By Shivaji Sarkar, 25 March 2024 |
|
|
Economic Highlights
New
Delhi, 25 March 2024
Shady
US Funds Mould Poll Bonds
OPEN
GATES FOR MURKY DEALS
By
Shivaji Sarkar
Is it the MNC-linked corporate
sector in a world of globalised economy that is dictating the course of
political establishment in India or is it the other way round? This is the
basic question that has cropped up in the follow-up to the Supreme Court verdict
in the electoral bonds case.A handful of companies today hog the limelight for
a reason no nation would feel proud of. Is it the beginning of a transnational
corporation corporate war?
It is roiling democracies from
the US to India with equal elan. On March 22, two incidents rocked Delhi --
seizure of Congress funds for not filing an income-tax return, though political
parties are not supposed to pay income tax, and the arrest of Delhi Chief Minister
Arvind Kejriwal for alleged involvement in a liquor scandal by the Enforcement
Directorate in a midnight drama.
Almost at the same time in New
York, US Attorney General Letitia James indicated that she could be preparing
to seize former President Donald Trump’s assets there, if he does not pay $ 464
million bond in financial fraud case. Manhattan
District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s office told Judge Juan Merchan that fewer than
270 of the 170,000 documents turned over to Trump’s lawyers pertain to the hush
money case.
What a similarity! In both
these cases corporate money is involved and thousands of km away they function
the same way. Are the two of the greatest democracies becoming the proverbial
banana republics?Is it that globalisation links them together?
For a mere Rs 16000-odd crore electoral
donations, has the country been pawned! A few select group of companies, many
with international links, have linkages with donations, deals and contracts
worth billions and the people are the unknown victims debating the unsavoury
practices. It calls for a deeper probe as deals influence decisions.
About 10 political parties
including the BSP and CPM, refused bond money. The CPM even is a party to the
cases in courts filed primarily by Association for Democratic Republic (ADR).
Janata Dal-U and Trinamool Congressalleged that certain amounts of bonds were dumped
in their offices. There is a lottery king, who showers donations to DMK, which
had passed a bill banning lottery but that could not turn into law as the
governor refuses to sign it. There are strange ways of bonds travelling to
centres of power in any State -- BJP Rs 11,500 crore; TMC Rs 3214;BRS Rs 2278
crore; DMK Rs 1230 crore and YSR Congress Rs 662
crore and Congress Rs 1356 crore.
Besides,
there’s less known development. On February 18, 2024, Jobanjot Singh Sandhu,
one of the accused in the Rs 21000 crore Mundra port drugs haul case, escaped
from police custody at Amritsar in Punjab. The value of one haul is greater
than the total bonds sale.On January 9, 2024, Ecuador declares state of emergency
after “extremely dangerous” druglord Jose Adolfo Macias, alias Fito, escapes
from jail and unrest breaks out at several prisons. Are these incidents a
pattern that democracies need to be wary of?
Hyderabad
based Megha Engineering gave Rs 584 crore to the BJP and its group company
Western UP Power Transmission Company chipped Rs 80 crore, a total of Rs 664
crore. Ironically, the UP power consumers have lodged extortion complaints by
manipulating bills. Sadly, these have gone unheard. Quick Supplyhaving reported
links with a large groupcontributed Rs 410 crore and mining group Vedanta also
made contributions. Vedanta, Western Power group and MKJ owning Keventer brand
are also among the top Congress funders donating more than Rs 100 crore each.
Despite
lottery ban in Andhra Pradesh, the Future Gaming donate Rs 154 crore bonds to
YSR Congress. Interestingly, the Telegu Desam Party got 55 percent of electoral
bond earnings in January 2024. It received Rs 80 crore between April 2019 and
September 2023. But from October 2023 to February this year, TDP received about
Rs 130 crore bonds. Of this Rs 118 crore was received in January alone, just at
the nick of elections.
A loss-making
Kolkata company, Avees, which shares office space with several other companies
on Waterloo Street, bought Rs 112.5 crore bonds and parked with Congress Rs 53
crore and TMC Rs 45.5 crore. It funds the
BJP, BJD and AAP too. There are several names like LN Mittal of the Arcelor-Mittal
group, Laxmidas Vallabhbhai Merchant, linked to a Gujarat company, Indigo’s
Rahul Bhati, who fund different political parties. Is it pressure or lure?
It is a
diverse link. But all are pointers that the corporates are working in tandem
with the political parties for mining their futureignoring the well-being of
the people.A question nobody answers how so much of money is available in a
poor country.Are they earning high by fleecing consumers? Corporate linkage is indicated
by some studies in the US.Is not the electoral bond based on the US Supreme
Court ruling?
The
corporate linkage has caused concern in the US since 2000. Corporate Money in
Politics by Andrew Wilson, in the MITSloan’s Magazine writes, the Centre for
Responsive Politics in its website Opensecrets.Org calculated that in 2010,large
public action committees (PACs) - corporate funders, spent $63 million. By
2020, it rose to $2.1 billion.
In 2010,
the US Supreme Court undid century-old campaign funding restrictions and
enabled corporations and other outside groups to “spend unlimited funds on
elections”. This results in more
centralisation of power. The top one percent of donors now give 93 percent of
the money, with a mere 100 persons providing 70 percent of it.
The U.S.
has, what is essentially legalized corruption that gives outsized influence to
the wealthy and powerful. What in other countries is done in back rooms and
with envelopes slipped under the table is aboveboard in the U.S, Wilson
observes. “The point is that major corporations have been knee-deep in
political influence for decades”. He asks the businesses to answer, “Are the
politicians you support blocking progress on our biggest challenges, or are
they helping us build a better world?”
Just see
the similarity in the pattern with India. Wilson names 24 top global companies
who doled out $170 million to US legislators over the past four years.Should
now Indians rethink globalisation and change their own political system? It is
not expanding businesses but creating an alliance of the murky corporate
finance that influences political and electoral decisions. Must not the country
end all such misty fundings?---INFA
(Copyright, India News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
Preparing For An AI World: THE ROLE OF EDUCATION By Rajiv Gupta, 23 March 2024 |
|
|
Spotlight
New Delhi, 23 March 2024
Preparing For An AI World
THE ROLE OF EDUCATION
By Rajiv Gupta
Scientific discoveries, technology, and innovation
have tended to disrupt the way in which humans think and act. This is a truism
from discoveries in astronomy and medicine to the invention of the wheel,
automobiles, and computers among other major human creations. The 2016
Hollywood movie “Hidden Figures” described the lives of three black
women computers who worked for NASA and who played an important role in the
first American manned space flight piloted by John Glenn.
It is difficult to imagine that, prior to the
invention of the modern day computers, complex and lengthy calculations
required for space travel were performed manually. Hence the three women were
called human computers. We know that the introduction of electronic computers
has totally changed the way in which we calculate anything, from household
budgets, to store checkout totals and any complex scientific calculation.
It is instructive to note that, about 50 years ago,
students were not permitted the use of pocket calculators in exams. Today they
are ubiquitous, embedded in devices such as mobile phones. Why this matters is
because when a new technology, such as the electronic computer is introduced,
human society takes time to absorb the technology in its day-to-day working.
And just as technology affects human thought and behavior, our education system
affects the direction of technology development and use.
Therefore, as we await a more complete development of
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and its impact in our lives, it would be useful to
consider how our education system should help steer society to assimilate the
technology meaningfully and to provide direction for its future growth.
In order to fully appreciate the role of education in
a world where AI will likely be as ubiquitous as the internet is today, three
major components of education need to be considered; the design of the
curriculum, the delivery of the content, and the assessment. Each of these
three aspects merit consideration.
The curriculum is a very crucial part of the education
experience. If the curriculum does not resonate with the needs of the students
and society, it will not matter how effectively it is taught. In the past,
course content was to a large extent, focused on the delivery of facts,
approaches, and methods of doing various activities. In most cases, facts
become outdated, and approaches and methods evolve as societal needs change.
What a good deal of curricula lack is helping students develop the ability to think
and learn. This ability would mean that the role of the student changes from a
passive recipient of information, to a collaborator, or participant in the
learning process. Also, the role of the faculty changes from someone who is a
storehouse of knowledge, to one who can draw out the best in each student.
In addition, there would need to be greater emphasis
on some of the soft skills, which do not receive much attention today. These
soft skills include critical thinking skills, communication skills, and
collaboration skills. Critical thinking is the ability to question, analyse,
interpret and make a judgement about what we read and hear. Since access to
facts will be simplified through AI, what people will need to develop is the
ability to dissect and use the information.
No matter how much the developers of AI claim, forming
judgements about actions to be taken will remain a human endeavor at least for
the foreseeable future. Communication skills are essential for people to get
their point across. However, current leadership in education does not necessarilysee
therole of education in developing these skills in students. This needs to
change. As problems faced by people in various walks of life become more
complex, it has become necessary to learn to collaborate with others. However,
the focus in our education systems is on developing individual performance.
This leaves a major gap in an essential skill that is required.
The second area where education needs to focus on is
the delivery of the material. Traditionally, the faculty person has been
assumed to be the source of all information where the faculty delivers lectures,
and learning by the students is a passive activity. In this model of education,
students are not active participants, and tend to forget the content of the
course shortly after a term is over.
There is sufficient empirical evidence to suggest that
if students participate in their learning, they will understand better and
retain the material for longer. This will require that the role of the faculty
change from the guru who knows everything, to one who engages the students and
facilitates learning. Greater class participation, in the form of discussions,
where alternative perspectives are encouraged and explored, helps students
better understand the relevance and application of what is being discussed in
class.
One of the more recent innovations in classroom
delivery format is the flipped mode of instruction. In this mode, the course
content is covered before the live lecture takes place. This can be either via
textbook readings, or via pre-taped lectures. The students are expected to read
or watch the content prior to the class. The classroom is purely focused on
discussion on the content. This allows for a richer understanding and deeper
insight of the material.
The third principal element of education is
assessment. Certainly, there have been advances in assessment in the last few
decades. The single assessment at the end of the term in the form of a final
exam has been replaced by more periodic assessment via quizzes, assignments and
projects. However, this needs to go much further. Assessment is still largely
based on proficiency in the completion of specific tasks. This begs the
question, “When a student finishes from a school or university with a certain
grade, what does that grade indicate in terms of the ability of the student other
than the completion of tasks which he/she was assigned?” There needs to be a
better way of assessing the competencies of students which can be useful in the
workplace.
The late Dr. W. E. Deming, the quality and management
guru, used to advocate the elimination of grades. At the very least he
suggested that the goal of the teacher/faculty should be that all students get
an ‘A.’ Such thinking flies in the face of the current practice where students
are assigned grades based on a curve in order to differentiate one student from
another. Empirical evidence does not suggest that grade differentiation among
students is predictive of future career successes for the students. Grades and
evaluation on a curve are deeply entrenched in our education system and will
take visionary leadership to change. However, this will be necessary for the
future students to develop and grow t meet new challenges.
This article has looked at some aspects of the current
education system that need to change to prepare the students for a future world
which will be powered by AI. Since it takes time to bring about major changes
in education, we need to start now.---INFA
(Copyright, India
News & Feature Alliance)
|
|
|
More...
-
Putin Wins 5th Term: INDIA & WORLD REACT By Prof. (Dr.) D.K. Giri, 22 March 2024
-
Claims and Poll Prospects, By Inder Jit, 21 March 2024
-
Land ‘Grab’, ‘Acquisition’: TOTAL REMEDY, NOT NEWS VITAL, By Dhurjati Mukherjee, 20 March 2
-
Perpetual Dance Of Democracy: ONE NATION, ONE POLL, ANYONE?, By Poonam I Kaushish, 19 March 2024
| << Start < Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>
| Results 19 - 27 of 5975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|